You know that the prefix mili means one thousandth or 1/100.
Numerically speaking, one thousandth is equals to 10 to the
power of negative 3.
Solving seconds to milliseconds:
6.7 seconds x 1000 milliseconds / 1 second
Cancelling out the unit seconds. Then multiplying 6.7 to 1000 milliseconds.
The answer is 6,700 milliseconds or 6.7 x 10^3 ms
For the regular sequence 1, 2, 3, ...,
, then sum is
If we multiply each number by 7 (7, 14, 21, ...), then the sum is
and if we add 1 to each number (8, 15, 22, ...) then the sum is
We have
terms, so the sum is:
Answer:
13 over 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi Jakeyriabryant! I hope you’re fine!
I hope I have understood the problem well.
If so, what the exercise raises is the following equality:
(x-1) / 5 = 2/3
From this equation you must clear the "x".
First, we pass the 5 that is dividing on the side of the x, to the other side and passes multiplying
(X – 1) / 5 = 2/3
(X – 1) = (2/3)*5
X – 1 = 10/3
Then we pass the one that is subtracting from the side of the x, to the other side and passes adding
X = 10/3 + 1
Remember that to add or subtract fractions they must have the same denominator or a common denominator (in this case we can write 1 as fraction 3/3). Then,
X = 10/3 + 3/3
X = 13/3
I hope I've been helpful!
Regards!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: u = 9.5hrs
Alternative: u =/ 9.5hrs
Using the t test
t = x-u/sd/√n
Where x is 10hrs, u is 9.5, sd is 1.6 and n is 15
t = 10-9.5 / (1.6/√15)
t = 0.5 / (0.4131)
t = 1.21
In order to make a conclusion, we have to find the p value at a significance level lot 0.1. The p value is 0.2263 which is greater than 0.1. This, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough statistical evidence to prove that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
\left[a \right] = \left[ \frac{2\,b}{3}\right][a]=[32b] totally answer
