All categories

2 years ago

My shadow in the back. Yeah no I need help. One again.

Mathematics

1 answer:

Neporo4naja [7]2 years ago

7 0

1 2/5 - (-3/5)

First, we're going to convert 1 2/5 into an improper fraction.

1 2/5 = 7/5

7/5 - (-3/5)

Subtracting a negative is the same as adding, so the problem will look like:

7/5 + 3/5

The denominators are the same, so we just add the numerators.

The answer is 10/5, or 2.

You might be interested in

Is this nonlinear? S

musickatia [10]

Answer: it seems to be Liner

Step-by-step explanation:

Has a Constant rate

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Relative density was determined for one sample of second-growth Douglas fir 2 x 3 4s with a low percentage of juvenile wood and

Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

0.03865

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the true density for the two types of trees are given, we would evaluate the average for both of them

Low percentage of juvenile wood density = 0.523 and 0.0543

Average density = 0.523 + 0.0543/2

Average density = 0.55015

Moderate percentage of juvenile wood density = 0.489 and 0.0450

Average density = 0.489 + 0.0450/2

Average density = 0.5115

Therefore, difference in true average density for the two woods are = 0.55015 - 0.51150

= 0.03865

5 0

3 years ago

No work needed!! Just answers, thank you! 25 points!!

Maurinko [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

$S_{31} = 9 \cdot 31 + [-0.5 \cdot \frac{31(31-1)}{2}] = 46.5$

$S_{40} = 40 + [-3 \cdot \frac{40(40-1)}{2}] = -2300$

3 0

3 years ago

URGENT PLS HELP I WILL GIVE MORE POINTS LATER!!!!!!!

xeze [42]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Please give brainiest :)

6 0

2 years ago

Which of these numbers are perfect squares or perfect cubes? Select the THREE answers that apply. 8 16 32/ 64 128 6 Omestian 12

Murljashka [212]

Answer:

8, 16, 64

Step-by-step explanation:

8 = 2^3 . . . a perfect cube

16 = 4^2 . . . a perfect square

32 = 2^5 . . . neither a cube nor a square

64 = 2^6 = 4^3 = 8^2 . . . both a perfect cube and a perfect square

128 = 2^7 . . . neither a cube nor a square

8 0

2 years ago