Answer:
Colonists were not allowed to vote for members of parliament
Explanation:
this led to the quote in the declaration of independence that said "no taxation without representation"
The correct answer would be, Take Over.
Imagine you are the owner of a business that makes cell phone covers. You have the opportunity to purchase other companies that make the same product as you. Eventually, you own all the major cell phone cover companies in the US. Take over principle is explained by the above scenario.
Explanation:
When one company, purchases another company, it is called as take over. Take overs happen when a comparatively larger company purchases the smaller company.
Take overs can happen in a friendly and welcoming environment, and also can happen in a hostile or unwelcoming condition or situation.
So when you purchase the other companies which are in the same business as you, because of any reason, this is called as take over.
Learn more about Take over at:
brainly.com/question/14473281
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:(a) The Monarchy
42 The only absolute monarchy in Africa is Eswatini, formerly Swaziland. ... The current monarch is Mswati III who has ruled Eswatini since 1986, after his father King Sobhuza II died in 1982 and following a period of regency.
Explanation:
Answer:
c The United States experiences a financial panic. a.p.e.x.
The correct answer is A) Slavery would be abolished in Washington DC.
The Compromise of 1850 was a critical law, as it helped to prevent the Civil War from starting in the 1850's. Due to America's expansion into the west and the newly gained territory after the Mexican American War, Northern and Southern politicians were arguing constantly over whether or not slavery will exist in these new territories.
To make both sides satisfied, Henry Clay helped to develop the Compromise of 1850.This included California becoming a free state, New Mexico and Utah using popular sovereignty to determine whether or not slavery would exist, and the slave trade would be outlawed in Washington DC. However, this law said nothing about the actual institution of slavery in DC.
