Answer:
with no context or like the story about the question i cannnot help
Explanation:
In Ambrose Bierce's short story, "An Event at Owl River Scaffold," Peyton Farquhar is a mainstay of the American South, which, amid the period being referred to, the Common War, can be generally meant mean a well off, upstanding native of the Alliance, and an adversary of the abolitionist development. At a very early stage in his story, Bierce gives the accompanying depiction of his hero who, in the story's opening sections, is going to be executed by hanging:
"The man who was occupied with being hanged was evidently around thirty-five years old. He was a non military personnel, on the off chance that one may judge from his propensity, which was that of a grower. . .Obviously this was no obscene professional killer."
Bierce goes ahead to develop his depiction of Peyton Farquhar, taking note of that this figure "was a well to do grower, of an old and exceedingly regarded Alabama family," and that, being "a slave proprietor and like other slave proprietors a legislator, he was normally a unique secessionist and vigorously committed toward the Southern reason." Bierce takes note of that Farquhar imagined himself at one point as an officer in the reason for the Alliance, however one whose military interests were hindered for reasons that are incidental to the account.
In area II of his story, Bierce gives foundation to clarify Farquhar's difficulty as referenced in the account's opening sections, portraying the primary hero's experience with a dark clad trooper, probably a Confederate warrior battling on an indistinguishable side of this contention from that to which Farquhar's sensitivities lie. It is soon uncovered, be that as it may, that this dim clad trooper is with the Association and has basically set-up the well-to-do southerner as an assumed saboteur. The "Government scout" does this by planting in the psyche of Farquhar the proposal of setting flame to the Owl Brook connect, a key structure vital to the development of Association troops as they progress over the South:
The fighter reflected. "I was there a month prior," he answered. "I watched that the surge of the previous winter had stopped an incredible amount of driftwood against the wooden dock at this finish of the extension. It is presently dry and would consume like tinder."
<span>The response to the inquiry - why was Peyton Farquhar hanged - lies in this recommendation negatively offered by the Government spy. Farquhar takes the draw, as it were, and endeavors to cut off the tie to keep its misuse by northern troopers.</span>
Answer:
A. low
Explanation:
High and low tides are part of the tidal cycle; high tide is when the level of the water is highest, so it's the farthest <em>inland</em>. Low tide is when the level of the water is lowest, so it's the farthest <em>offshore</em>.
Neap tides are when high tides are lower than normal and low tides are higher than normal. Spring tides are the opposite, when high tides are higher than normal and low tides are lower than normal.
Only low tides makes sense here, so the answer is A.
Remark
Let's refine your topic just a little.
Most of the rotten characters (the Monk and the Friar) are characterized as greedy, self serving, apologetic (meaning they make excuses for why they do what they do), lusty (the miller), the Wife of Bath (although to be truthful, she's pretty complex and I think Chaucer kind of likes her), the Manciple, the Reeve, The Franklin, the plowman, the Man of Law, and the Physician.
I think your question could be to begin with, how does each of them use money. How does money corrupt them (if it does), how is money and wealth obtained. How is money used. Are their any substitutes for money -- like the Wife of Bath and her 5 husbands.
What does the Narrator think of money? There is an old saying, you know what really happened when you follow the money. The rise of the middle class was absolutely impossible without realizing how the middle class began to accumulate wealth. That was their first step.
Some were corrupt. Some were greedy. Some were lacking in virtue. Some had too much and had few faults except in the way they handled money.
The Friar and Monk can be included in this discussion, because they cheated the church that they were supposed to be supporting. The Friar begged, but he had no use for those who had no choice but to beg, like lepers. Once you see how the middle class acquired wealth, you will see how they began to rise up the ladder of social control.
He who can tie and untie the purse strings, is he who can demand that others do his bidding.
Well, Mutiny is basically a group of two or more people and sometimes they can be members of something like the military. They don't agree with a lawful authority and so they think that they can overthrow that authority because they just don't agree with what the law says.
