1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna35 [415]
3 years ago
15

Plz help! Should the United States practice isolationism today? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
Nadya [2.5K]3 years ago
6 0
Absolutely not because this would mean we'd not work with International countries and many other things. Look up the definition of Isolationism and come up with your own answer in your own words because it's asking you to provide your own opinion
You might be interested in
How was the establishment of new states and territories in the West connected to unruly behavior in mining
poizon [28]

Answer:

Isolated from law reach

Explanation:

Most western states grew on the promise of mining, people moved by the hundreds of thousands and the U.S did not have the infrastructure at the time. in some places they might have not been a sheriff for hundreds of miles thus most people did not belive that there was nearly any consequences for their actions which caused unpredictable and usually bad behavior

5 0
2 years ago
Where do you suppose the term "massacre" came from that describes
Morgarella [4.7K]
From Middle French massacre"wholesale slaughter, carnage," from Old French macacre, macecle "slaughterhouse, butchery," of unknown origin; perhaps related to Latin macellum "provisions store, butcher shop."
4 0
3 years ago
Use this passage to answer the following question:
Scrat [10]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I would say C because, clearly the mother wanted to find her lost children. It could also be A just because they were sold so it could be the cost of a human life. I think C would be the safest answer just based of context of the mother and the children with them be sold.

6 0
2 years ago
The Civil War lasted much longer than people expected. How would a longer war affect the home front?
Ahat [919]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

It might make it harder to farm and take care of animals with men off fighting.

Supplies, like food, flour, or candles, might run out.

Fighting might take place in fields, destroying crops.

People might have to do without the things they need.

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

The country suffers from war faces lot of issues like ruining of homes and properties, destroy of crops, shortage of supplies like food, flour and other stuff. People might work without the things they require.

The Civil War hit life on the home front as well as the battleground. Families throughout the North and South suffered deficiencies of supplies, had their fields and homes ruined, or in some situations seized to be practiced for the war effort.  Work of women and children changed in all aspects. For the first time, many women gained authority of farms or properties, served as nurses on and off the battleground, and even challenged in combat. Families were split separate as loved ones were forwarded off to fight.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the Muslim ruler Akbar known for?
alex41 [277]
C. <span>mandating religious and cultural tolerance throughout his empire
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following groups advocated militancy?
    11·2 answers
  • Why would Mayor Hartsfield organize biracial committees to help Atlanta make changes?
    6·1 answer
  • You are starting a new homebuilding business and are responsible for choosing a location to build your first subdivision. You wa
    13·1 answer
  • Which president dealt with the issue or event watergate
    12·1 answer
  • I need some help here please
    8·1 answer
  • What are opposites of federalists? i need 3
    11·2 answers
  • Power is divided between state, local, and federal governments
    8·2 answers
  • Abraham Lincoln was not a
    12·1 answer
  • Pls help I need a good grade
    5·1 answer
  • What might be some of the benefits of having both Congress and the President involved in foreign policy?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!