Answer:
This is the answer of your question.
Its b have an amazing day
According to the context, having an appreciation for the workings of another person's mind is considered a prerequisite for Intellectual development.
<h3>What is intellectual development?</h3>
They are all the processes through which the human being acquires skills that allow him to interpret reality and interact.
That is to say, it refers, fundamentally, to the development of perception and thought, the various stages that consolidate the innate capacity of the human being to think, reason and use his mental tools.
Therefore, we can conclude that according to the context, having an appreciation for the workings of another person's mind is considered a prerequisite for Intellectual development.
Learn more about Intellectual development here: brainly.com/question/4433518
#SPJ1
I believe the answer is: Famous people
Peer pressure refers to a direct influence that is initiated by people that are in close proximity with your social group. Even though famous people can influence other people in a certain way, they are tend to be in long proximity than you and cannot be categorized as peer pressure.
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
