Answer:
Confirmation
Explanation:
In scenarios whereby an individual gives more credence to the his or her existing belief while failing to give consideration to happenings or possibilities which may say otherwise. We might see this a an act of being rigid on a certain piece of information or belief to the extent than one dispels all possible scenarios which may prove the otherwise to the belief. In the scenario above, Carmellas existing belief thatbtge inability to deliver at work is only based in incompetence of the worker while filing to examine the possibility whereby the tasks being dished out to the worker might be difficult.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The next step that Vanessa would have to take is to sign a DoD Statement of Understanding and provide it to her APC.
Explanation:
- Every single event in the programs run by the Department of Defense of the United States is intelligently planned and capable of carrying out required verification at every single stage of the program.
- In the given example, the agency program coordinator requires Vanessa to sign and submit with him the statement issued by the Department of Defense before letting Vanessa have her travel card.
- The submission of the signed statement with the APC thus formulates the last step of the procedure of securing a travel card issued by the DoD.
Answer:
Option b
Explanation:
According to the Labeling theory, the behavior of the people is identified and reflected by the ways people how they are being labeled by others.
This theory has its association with criminal sociology and deviance.
This theory reflects on the fact that the behavior of the people is influenced negatively by the ways that people label them as deviant.
Deviance can be defined as the behavior that results in the violation of the norms of the society social norms, and serves as a rule of adequate seriousness to warrant dissatisfaction from most of society.
Thus it follows that option B complies with the interpretation of the deviance.
Answer:
Select temperature changes as the method of producing physiological stress.
Explanation:
Protection from Harm
In research, all psychologists are held bound by ethical obligation to ensure that their participants or volunteers to research work are safe from psychological and physiological harm.
Protection from Harm is handled by researcher through the Anticipation of harm and stopping the study.
Psychologists defend their research ethically by saying and proving that any harm caused to their participants was unexpected.
In research, it means that a researcher cannot expose individual volunteers to physical or emotional risks. Also unintentional distress is possible.
The three ethical principle stated by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research are: respect for person, beneficence, and justice.
