Answer:
<em>e</em><em>x</em><em>p</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>f</em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>c</em><em>y</em><em>.</em>
Explanation:
<em>e</em><em>x</em><em>p</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>f</em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>c</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>m</em><em>o</em><em>s</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>p</em><em>p</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>p</em><em>r</em><em>i</em><em>a</em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>o</em><em>m</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>e</em><em>s</em><em>s</em><em>i</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>d</em><em>u</em><em>c</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>e</em><em>l</em><em>o</em><em>w</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>o</em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em>n</em><em>t</em><em>i</em><em>a</em><em>l</em><em> </em><em>G</em><em>D</em><em>P</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
A tax cut that will last for only a year will not have a huge effect on the aggregate demand as the aggregate demand increases only when the tax cut is permanent.
The given statement is false.
<h3>What is a tax?</h3>
A tax is a liability imposed on the taxpayer to pay a specified sum to the government based on the income they have earned in the previous year.
When the cutting of taxes becomes permanent in the country, then the citizens can start to acquire more which will increase the spending. The families will expect that the tax cuts are for the longer term which now induces them to buy and spend more and also act as an addition to their incomes. This whole impact would eventually lead to rising in aggregate demand.
Therefore, the demand increases when the tax cuts are permanent rather than when tax cuts are for only one year.
Learn more about the tax cut policies in the related link:
brainly.com/question/13924294
#SPJ1
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer:
$200000 + $200000 +$50000(to COLE's bonus)
= $450000
Ruby corporation uses accrual method.
A corporation that is using accrual method, cannot claim a deduction for an accrual with respect to a related party until the recipient reports that amount as income.
Here, Cole owns more than 50% (55%) so its a related party and it will report bonus on february 1,2017
Therefore, Ruby can not deduct bonus payable to oliver in 2016
Hence total deductible in 2017 would be $450000.
Recent studies clearly indicate an association between TV advertising of foods and drinks and<u> the prevalence of childhood obesity,</u> especially in the United States.
<h3>What is Obesity?</h3>
This refers to the medical condition where a person is overweight and has an excess Body Mass Index.
Hence, we can see that based on the research made, it was found that there was a direct link between the use of TV advertising of foods and drinks and<u> the prevalence of childhood obesity,</u> especially in the United States.
Read more about obesity here:
brainly.com/question/1646944
#SPJ1