Answer: The competition policy and the wrongs of the past and make South Africa a better place due to the following reasons:
- Part of the new international orthodoxy in economic policy is the competition policy and at the same time was viewed in South Africa as a crucial element of economic transformation.
- This article reviews the experiences of developing countries such as Brazil South Korea and the role of competition policy in the economic development.
- After 1994 in South Africa it then assesses the effect of competition policy the main focus Bheem on the performance of new competition institution which was established in
1994.
- To assess the approach and impact of the institution in the concentrated sector the case of the Steel industry is used that head simultaneously undergoes processes of liberalisation and domestic consolidation.
Explanation:
I hope these help you out
It's either A or C, sorry if I'm wrong
McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
Diction is word choice.
Examples:
Blundered
Brandishing
Snivels
Answer:
b
Explanation:
the washing machine is being talked about in the state that it is in
i really said washing maching XD
