1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Morgarella [4.7K]
3 years ago
10

It is people who have extraordinary skill, courage and determination who deserve to be famous, not those who have good looks or

lots of money or behave badly.
Write an article to your local newspaper in which you argue your viewpoint for or against this matter
English
1 answer:
Jlenok [28]3 years ago
4 0

In my opinion, good looks and behaving childishly is what the standard is these days. It's not that the people who have extraordinary skill, courage, and determination did anything wrong or are missing a step in accomplishing their goals, it's the people. In this day and age, teens have the need to support people that make them laugh even if the subject is revolting. For example, an app includes many talented people, but those people don't get enough recognition because some teens just aren't interested in a majority of the people that actually have talent, instead, they focus on hyping up people that do a small dance with their arms and have an appealing appearance. If we change today's standards and revolve into a more knowledgeable society, talented people that actually deserve fame would get what they deserve.

<em>Not the best.....yeah it's really bad but it's almost 5 am and I got no sleep so don't come at me, thank you. </em>

You might be interested in
To prepare for the birthday party, I made the food, blew up the balloons,
Advocard [28]
The figurative language is To, food, blew, balloons, scooped; assonance
3 0
3 years ago
Examine the following passages to determine whether they contain arguments. For those passages that do contain arguments, rewrit
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

1) This passage does not contain an argument. It begins with a comment that everyone knows the U.S. is having an election (in 2008); the author proceeds to state three things that he thinks Europe should focus on.  He does not offer reasons for his statement that these three things are jobs, Muslims, and neighbors.

2) This passage contains both an argument and a sub-argument. 1.The butler was passionately in love with the victim. Thus, 2. It was not the butler who committed the murder. 3. Either the butler committed the murder or the judge committed the murder. Therefore, 4. The judge committed the murder.  The sub-argument goes from (1) to (2), and the main argument goes from (2) and (3) to (4). Note again:  identifying the structure does not imply saying that this is a good argument.

3) This passage contains an argument. Standardization: (1) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish can know whether that other person deserves punishment.  (2) No one who cannot know whether another person deserves punishment has a right to punish that person.  Therefore,  (3) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish another person has a right to punish that person.

7 0
3 years ago
PLZ HURRY
elena55 [62]

Answer:

"The Inchcape Rock" is a ballad written by English poet Robert Southey. Published in 1802, it tells the story of a 14th-century attempt by the Abbot of Aberbrothok ("Aberbrothock") to install a warning bell on Inchcape, a notorious sandstone reef about 11 miles (18 km) off the east coast of Scotland. The poem tells how the bell was removed by a pirate, who subsequently perished on the reef while returning to Scotland in bad weather some time later.

Like many of Southey's ballads "The Inchcape Rock" describes a supernatural event, but its basic theme is that those who do bad things will ultimately be punished accordingly and poetic justice done.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.How is evaluating an argument different from analyzing it?
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

1) When you are evaluating arguments, you are deciding if you have been persuaded by the arguments. Analysing the claim is the first step, but even justified claims can fail to persuade you if you have read other counter-arguments. When evaluating arguments you are bringing in your wider reading of the literature.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Pros and cons of technology ( 100 words )
Bogdan [553]

Technology is a modern day gift, but it can also be a curse. Depending on how users utilize tech to their advantage, their actions can either push society forward or create a negative impact. For example, tech has provided cars, factory machinery, more efficient communication, a stunning method of planetary exploration, and a multitude of other things. However, people with malicious intent can use tech as means of cyber bullying, fraud, hacking and stealing people's information, pedophilia, and an unhealthy amount of exposure to the world for younger children. Tech has many benefits, but also many setbacks, it just depends on how people use it.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What's the theme of rogue waves by T.Taylor with quotes?
    10·1 answer
  • We acknowledge the sources of information used in a research paper by giving ___.
    9·2 answers
  • How did Mallam Sile get Abeeba to marry him
    14·1 answer
  • Can You Describe Marches Character in The Book Loot: How To Steal A Fortune?
    10·1 answer
  • What are your attitude toward community colleges.
    6·2 answers
  • Which cultural idea about lions does this excerpt support?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the doster family move to Florida? <br><br><br> HELP ME PLEASE IM GONNA FAIL
    8·1 answer
  • _______ is capital of India​
    15·2 answers
  • Solve pls brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP IM BEGGING I STALLED AND NOW I DONT KNOW HOW TO DO THIS
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!