Answer:
The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves "Federalists." Their adopted name implied a commitment to a loose, decentralized system of government. In many respects "federalism" which implies a strong central government was the opposite of the proposed plan that they supported.
Explanation:
The south didn't grow crops very much, instead they grew cotton which made them rely on the North for crops and other materials. So the correct answer would be "B" since that seems like the most plausible answer.
I would know about John Marshall. He was a federalist supreme court chief justice. He gave more power to the government by taking a loose construction of the Constitution. So basically he said, "If it doesnt say we (Fed Gov't) cant do it, then we can)".
<span>Know about these Court cases </span>
<span>Gibbons V. Ogden </span>
<span>McCullough V. Maryland </span>
<span>Fletcher V. Peck </span>
<span>Cohens V. Virginia </span>
<span>Barron V. Baltimore- this one is hard to find, so basically it just said that because the Bill of Rights was a Federal decision, it didnt apply to the states. </span>
<span>The rest are really easy to find out about, and you could type in John Marshall and it would probably give you all of these. </span>
<span>http://www.ushistory.org/valleyforge/served/marshall.html </span>
<span>http://www.lawnix.com/cases/gibbons-ogden.html- heres gibbons/ogden</span>
Answer:
freedom of speech and expression, freedom of religion and conscience, freedom of assembly, and the right to equal protection before the law.
