Answer:
y=⁻ 
should be your answer in decimal form its y=-0.619047
Step-by-step explanation:
Numbers I think I'm not that smart
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
![\displaystyle = \frac{x^2(y-2)}{3y} \\\\Put \ x = 3, \ y = -1\\\\= \frac{(3)^2(-1-2)}{3(-1)}\\\\= \frac{9(-3)}{-3} \\\\= 9 \\\\ \rule[225]{225}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E2%28y-2%29%7D%7B3y%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5CPut%20%5C%20x%20%3D%203%2C%20%5C%20y%20%3D%20-1%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%283%29%5E2%28-1-2%29%7D%7B3%28-1%29%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B9%28-3%29%7D%7B-3%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%209%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Crule%5B225%5D%7B225%7D%7B2%7D)
Hope this helped!
<h3>~AH1807</h3><h3>Peace!</h3>
Answer:
¬(W∨S)→¬(J∨E)
D→(B∨C)
X is true
No
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypotheses "neither water nor soft drinks can quench your thirst" translates to ¬(W∨S) ("neither nor" negates the disjunction W∨S). The "if,... then" translates to the implication symbol (arrow). The conclusion "juice will not do it, unless the juice contains electrolytes" translates to ¬(J∨E). This is because if J or E were true, then J would be true (because E implies J), contrary to the conclusion that J is false ("juice will not do it"), then J∨S is false.
The hypothesis here is "the dyer breaks" hence D is the hypothesis. The conclusion is "we will hang the clothes to dry, or take the clothes to a coin-operated laundry" which is the same as (B∨C).
The proposition p→p is always true (according to truth tables). In this case, p:=X is true, then p is true and X is true.
X∨Y is false if and only if X is false and Y is false, so both statements X,Y must be false.
