To identify the content of the training is A.Operations
In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
Answer:
sets a principle of goals for the party
Answer:
The answer is a. Symbolic interactionism.
Explanation:
This theory states that society creates meaning through interactions, and these "symbols" influence people's behaviour.
Symbolic interactionism explains that certain ideas are learned through repetition and observation. That is the reason Kara, in the example, has "learned" that she is not very bright.
I believe it would be B. I kinda know what it's like.
