Step-by-step explanation:
all work is shown and pictured
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming there is a punitive removal of one point for an incorrect response.
Five undiscernable choices: 20% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 0.20*(1) + 0.80*(-1) = -0.60
Four undiscernable choices: 25% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 0.25*(1) + 0.75*(-1) = -0.50
I'll use 0.33 as an approzimation for 1/3
Three undiscernable choices: 33% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 0.33*(1) + 0.67*(-1) = -0.33 <== The approximation is a little ugly.
Two undiscernable choices: 50% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 0.50*(1) + 0.50*(-1) = 0.00
And thus we see that only if you can remove three is guessing neutral. There is no time when guessing is advantageous.
One Correct Answer: 100% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 1.00*(1) + 0.00*(-1) = 1.00
Answer:
37 %
Step-by-step explanation:
here..
only Dog = 20- 5 - 4 - 1 = 10
only goats = 30 - 5 - 3 - 1 = 21
only cattle = 40 - 4 - 3 - 1 = 32
then ... since the maximum percentage is 100 %
people who don't own any animal = 100% - 10% - 21% - 32% = 37 %
Answer:
A. 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Nothing can be equal to itself if you subtract 9 from it.
She worked 30 hours per week.
The problem turns out to be the following:
2x+15=3x-15.
First you need to have only one x variable so you subtract the X's:
3x-2x=X
The problem now turns into 15=x-15.
You have to isolate the X so you do x+15. You have to do the same to the other side so 15+15=30, therefore x=30
