Polonius' reason for Hamlet being sad was:
- C. He forbid Ophelia to talk to Hamlet
<h3>Hamlet</h3>
This refers to the old Shakespearean drama which tells the tale of Hamlet who has a thirst for power which led him to commit murders and to take over the throne.
With this in mind, Polonius believes that Hamlet is sad because he has not spoken to Ophelia whom he forbade from speaking to Hamlet because Hamlet was fond of her.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C
Read more about Ophelia here:
brainly.com/question/11468942
Answer:
Kairos is a rhetorical strategy that considers the timeliness of an argument or message, and its place in the zeitgeist. The term comes from the Greek for “right time,” “opportunity,” or “season.” Modern Greek also defines kairos as “weather.” A kairos appeal depends a great deal on knowing which way the wind blows.
So i think timing
Explanation:
The correct answer is <em>false</em>. The amulet that Mrs. Chen hung on a gold chain under her blouse was for her to remember her past life in China.
Answer:
my child is yet a stranger in the world; she hath not seen the change of fourteen years, let two more summers wither in their pride, ere we may think her ripe to be a bride.
Explanation:
Answer:
Anthropogenic climate changes stress the importance of understanding why people harm the environment despite their attempts to behave in climate friendly ways. This paper argues that one reason behind why people do this is that people apply heuristics, originally shaped to handle social exchange, on the issues of environmental impact. Reciprocity and balance in social relations have been fundamental to social cooperation, and thus to survival, and therefore the human brain has become specialized by natural selection to compute and seek this balance. When the same reasoning is applied to environment-related behaviors, people tend to think in terms of a balance between “environmentally friendly” and “harmful” behaviors, and to morally account for the average of these components rather than the sum. This balancing heuristic leads to compensatory green beliefs and negative footprint illusions—the misconceptions that “green” choices can compensate for unsustainable ones. “Eco-guilt” from imbalance in the moral environmental account may promote pro-environmental acts, but also acts that are seemingly pro-environmental but in reality more harmful than doing nothing at all. Strategies for handling problems caused by this cognitive insufficiency are discussed.
Explanation:
