The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
This is kinda hard sense they do produce a lot of major industries in the U.S like natural gas, tourism, etc.But as for the BEST answer I'd say D)
The answer to this question is, The Marshall Plan. This plan is in which the US gave the European nations 13 Billion dollars so they could rebuild what was lost after the war. I hope this helps you.
Answer:
I will answer these personally haha, I had the same assignment :)
Explanation:
1. Single use plastics, polluting the ocean are a part of or daily life, and is messing up our oceans. In 100 years, if we make an effort to clean the oceans, we can advance pollution control.
2. Confrontation with fear itself. "The only thing to fear is fear itself". I would rather die than be paranoid over nothing.
3. Because either the person is forced abusively by the significant other, or they are forced upon by a problem, such as pregnancy, or economic issues.
4. Lack of use in certain organs. Humans can live without having certain organs such as an appendix, and etc. In the past, we needed these to survive in a world where an organism's fitness isn't compromised.
5. No. In my opinion, based on how the world is going, I feel like humans won't be able to evolve into something else. I believe that we will be extinct before we can because the world is focused on war, economy, etc., rather than the health of our own planet, which we need in order to survive.
6. I feel like the family surrounding the eldery or members of government should take care of them. Family comes first, not personal benefit.
