Answer:
Federal agencies' financial information for a comparable time period.
Explanation:
Benchmarking can be regarded as management accounting innovation, which is been utilized in both the private and the public sectors for performance measurement as management. There are alot of success reported by public sector accounting researchers with the use of benchmarking, however there is
charged problems that still exist in implementing as well as using this management technique. The appropriate benchmarks for a state or local government to use as a basis for comparing performance are;
✓Socioeconomic and demographic trends of governments of similar types and size available from U.S. Census Bureau.
✓ A government's own operating results and financial position from prior years.
✓ International City/County Management Association's Financial Trend Monitoring System results for governments of similar types and size.
Robert should use intermittent schedules of reinforcement to keep his employees mentally alert and interested. The procedure of learning through association to increase or decrease voluntary behavior using punishment and reinforcement is known as operant conditioning.
Reinforcement schedules are the rules that govern the timing and frequency of reinforcer delivery in order to increase the likelihood that a target behavior will occur again, strengthen, or continue. A contingency timetable is one that includes reinforcement. While intermittent schedules provide reinforcers.
After some but not all correct replies, intermittent schedules apply reinforcement after each correct response, or none at all. Reinforcers are only used after the target behavior has occurred, so reinforcement is conditional on the desired behavior.
To learn more about intermittent click here,
brainly.com/question/27612374
#SPJ4
Answer:
value of the bond = $2,033.33
Explanation:
We know,
Value of the bond, ![B_{0} = [I * \frac{1 - (1 + i)^{-n}}{i}] + \frac{FV}{(1 + i)^n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=B_%7B0%7D%20%3D%20%5BI%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B1%20-%20%281%20%2B%20i%29%5E%7B-n%7D%7D%7Bi%7D%5D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7BFV%7D%7B%281%20%2B%20i%29%5En%7D)
Here,
Face value of par value, FV = $2,000
Coupon payment, I = Face value or Par value × coupon rate
Coupon payment, I = $2,000 × 6.04%
Coupon payment, I = $128
yield to maturity, i = 6.1% = 0.061
number of years, n = 15
Therefore, putting the value in the formula, we can get,
![B_{0} = [128 * \frac{1 - (1 + 0.061)^{-7}}{0.061}] + [\frac{2,000}{(1 + 0.061)^7}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=B_%7B0%7D%20%3D%20%5B128%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B1%20-%20%281%20%2B%200.061%29%5E%7B-7%7D%7D%7B0.061%7D%5D%20%2B%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2%2C000%7D%7B%281%20%2B%200.061%29%5E7%7D%5D)
or, ![B_{0} = [128 * \frac{1 - (1.061)^{-7}}{0.061}] + [\frac{2,000}{(1.061)^7}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=B_%7B0%7D%20%3D%20%5B128%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B1%20-%20%281.061%29%5E%7B-7%7D%7D%7B0.061%7D%5D%20%2B%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2%2C000%7D%7B%281.061%29%5E7%7D%5D)
or, ![B_{0} = [128 * \frac{0.3393}{0.061}] + 1,321.3635](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=B_%7B0%7D%20%3D%20%5B128%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B0.3393%7D%7B0.061%7D%5D%20%2B%201%2C321.3635)
or, ![B_{0} = [128 * 5.5623] + 1,321.3635](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=B_%7B0%7D%20%3D%20%5B128%20%2A%205.5623%5D%20%2B%201%2C321.3635)
or,
$711.9738 + 1,321.3635
Therefore, value of the bond = $2,033.33
Answer:
year net cash flow
0 -$150,000
1 $80,000
2 $65,000
3 $50,000
4 $40,000
A) NPV = -$150,000 + ($80,000 x .87) + ($65,000 x .756) + ($50,000 x .658) + ($40,000 x .572) = -$150,000 + $69,600 + $49,140 + $32,900 + $22,880 = -$150,000 + $174,520 = $24,520
B) Yes , because the net present value indicates that the return on the proposal is greater than the minimum desired rate of return of 15%. Since the NPV is positive ($24,520), it means that the cash inflows are higher than the cash outflows when we use a 15% discount rate.