The radius of the circle below is 5 inches. What is the diameter of the circle?

1 day 24 hours 60 minutes 60 seconds

torisob [31]

Answer:

86,400

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Help please with algebra problem

Strike441 [17]

Number of weekend minutes used: x
Number of weekday minutes used: y

This month Nick was billed for 643 minutes:
(1) x+y=643

The charge for these minutes was $35.44
Telephone company charges $0.04 per minute for weekend calls (x)
and $0.08 per minute for calls made on weekdays (y)
(2) 0.04x+0.08y=35.44

We have a system of 2 equations and 2 unkowns:
(1) x+y=643
(2) 0.04x+0.08y=35.44

Using the method of substitution
Isolating x from the first equation:
(1) x+y-y=643-y
(3) x=643-y

Replacing x by 643-y in the second equation
(2) 0.04x+0.08y=35.44
0.04(643-y)+0.08y=35.44
25.72-0.04y+0.08y=35.44
0.04y+25.72=35.44

Solving for y:
0.04y+25.72-25.72=35.44-25.72
0.04y=9.72

Dividing both sides of the equation by 0.04:
0.04y/0.04=9.72/0.04
y=243

Replacing y by 243 in the equation (3)
(3) x=643-y
x=643-243
x=400

Answers:
The number of weekends minutes used was 400
The number of weekdays minutes used was 243

6 0

2 years ago

How do I solve this equation using long polynomial division?

gulaghasi [49]

Oh okie oh gosh lol lol I don’t know

8 0

2 years ago

URGENT: PLEASE HELP!!!

algol [13]

Answer:

7 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

try putting (1.6 x 7.5)+48 in a calculator i just put random numbers in the x spot until i got 60 lol

3 0

2 years ago

To compare two programs for training industrial workers to perform a skilled job, 20 workers are included in an experiment. Of t

nikklg [1K]

Answer:

$t=\frac{19.1-23.3}{\sqrt{\frac{4.818^2}{10}+\frac{5.559^2}{10}}}}=-1.805$

$p_v =P(t_{(18)}$

If we compare the p value and the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can conclude the the true mean for method 1 is lower than the mean for the method 2 at 5% of significance

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

We can calculate the sample mean and deviation with these formulas:

$\bar X = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i}{n}$

$s= \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i -\bar X)^2}{n-1}}$

$\bar X_{1}=19.1$ represent the mean for the sample mean for 1

$\bar X_{2}=23.3$ represent the mean for the sample mean for 2

$s_{1}=4.818$ represent the sample standard deviation for the sample 1

$s_{2}=5.559$ represent the sample standard deviation for the sample 2

$n_{1}=10$ sample size selected 1

$n_{2}=10$ sample size selected 2

$\alpha$ represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the average time taken when training under method 1 is less than the average time for Method 2, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{1} \geq \mu_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_{1} < \mu_{2}$

If we analyze the size for the samples both are less than 30 so for this case is better apply a t test to compare means, and the statistic is given by:

$t=\frac{\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2}}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{s^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}}$ (1)

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other".

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

$t=\frac{19.1-23.3}{\sqrt{\frac{4.818^2}{10}+\frac{5.559^2}{10}}}}=-1.805$

P-value

The first step is calculate the degrees of freedom, on this case:

$df=n_{1}+n_{2}-2=10+10-2=18$

Since is a one sided test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(t_{(18)}$

Conclusion

If we compare the p value and the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can conclude the the true mean for method 1 is lower than the mean for the method 2 at 5% of significance

4 0

2 years ago