It's called Agenda setting. The ability to "affect the emphasis put on the themes of the public agenda" is referred to as agenda-setting.
What is agenda-setting?
The ability to "affect the emphasis put on the themes of the public agenda" is referred to as agenda-setting. The study of agenda-setting outlines the methods used by the media to try to sway viewers and create a hierarchy of news importance.
According to the argument, news media sets the public agenda by getting people to believe what they want them to. For instance, the media's emphasis on the types of jobs that each gender should perform while completely ignoring the concept of gender equality fosters the same mentality in people.
The list of topics or issues that government officials, as well as those closely connected to the outside of government, are paying special attention to at any one time.
Learn more about agenda-setting here:
brainly.com/question/9596184
#SPJ4
Answer:
I would be a Federalist.
Explanation:
the main difference between the federalist and anti-federalists is on their opinion on how much power the central government should have over the states.
Federalist wanted the government to have more power and the anti-federalist wanted the government to have less power. In Hindsight, anti-federalists' idea sounds better. Since it will give the government less influence to disrupt the people.
But considering the issues that they faced at the time, I believe more government power was necessary.
The earlier draft of the constitution did not provide the central government with crucial power such as ability to collect taxes or create a centralized military. Both of those issues were supported by the Federalist.
Answer:
i would say it looks like they are in a war orrrr the people geting shot did somthing wrourng and r getting killed
Explanation:
