Answer with Explanation:
The evaluation of every matter requires a framework based on a useful ideas that are required for a better judgement for deriving a solution like if we want to resolve a mathematical problem, then we will use mathematical functions like +, -, *, etc so that we are able to solve the question because these are the ideas that are based on a useful ideas (Logic). Likewise when we want to assess whether the argument is good or not, we will require an ethical standard framework to evaluate the good in the argument.
So yes, I agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument because it is the framework which decides which argument is good or not. These ethical values in a particular argument is a move from not good to good argument. Greater the ethical values in an argument the more is the argument good as per ethical principles.
Answer:
The statement states that taxes paid by the population to reduce the national debt will be converted into benefits for the population itself. So, in the end, the population is not spending money, just putting it in different places.
Explanation:
National debt is the term that refers to the debts that the government of a country has to finance works and improvements in the country that cannot be paid with the taxes paid alone. However, this debt will be paid by the collection of taxes, which may become higher, so that these works can be carried out. In a simplified way, governments understand that the expenses of the national debt must be paid by the generations of citizens who will benefit from these expenses, as this allows the population not to lose money, but to exchange it for benefits, that is, the national debt reallocates the population's money in works and actions that will improve the lives of this population, for this reason, governments claim that the national debt is like taking money out of the left pocket and putting it in the right pocket.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not include questions, we can say the following.
Erikson's concept of generativity is similar to the Biblical concept of generosity or do good to others.
When we are talking about psychological terms, scientist Erik Erikson developed eight stages of his theory called psychosocial development. The term "Generativity" was introduced in the seventh stage of the theory when the author refers to Generativity vs. Stagnation. Erikson says that during this stage of the life of humans, people focus on making positive contributions that benefit other human beings.
Answer: D Withdrawal
Explanation:
Withdrawal is a psychological defence mechanism which is a psychoanalytic term meaning the tendency to escape from situations that may be experienced as emotionally or psychologically challenging