What is the rationale behind the optimal choice of the consumer?

Ski Safety sells emergency safety and rescue products to ski patrols and rescue workers at prices that are below those of its co

UkoKoshka [18]

Answer: Cost focus strategy

Explanation:

The cost focus strategy is one of the type of business strategy in which the various types of companies or organizations are try to expand their marketing segments and also emphasizing the cost in the market.

The cost focus strategy is one of the important element and component of the generic marketing strategy in the market.

According to the given question, the ski safety selling the various types of products for the rescue purpose and it outlining the main objective and start selling on the basis of emergency at very high cost.

Therefore, Ski safety is basically pursing the cost focus strategy.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following best describes a Nash equilibrium? An outcome from which one or both competitors can improve their positi

amid [387]

The question is reconstructed below:

Which of the following best describes a Nash equilibrium?

A. An outcome from which one or both competitors can improve their position by adopting an alternative strategy.

B. The unstable outcome of a repeated game.

C. An outcome that is stable only because of credible threats.

D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.

Answer:

D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.

Explanation:

Although Nash equilibrium is a game theory, it has been widely applied in economics. It states that a competitor can achieve his desired outcome by sticking to his original strategy. Both competitors' strategies are optimal when considering the decisions of each other.

8 0

3 years ago

In a recent annual report, Rosh Corporation disclosed that 60,000,000 shares of common stock have been authorized. At the beginn

irina [24]

Answer:

33,880,934 stocks

Explanation:

total number of authorized stocks = 60,000,000

stocks issued at beginning of the year = 36,356,357

treasury stocks at beginning of the year = 7,171,269

net change in total stocks outstanding = additional shares issued - increase in treasury stocks = 558,765 - 3,034,188 = -2,475,423

total number of stocks outstanding = outstanding stocks at the beginning of the year + net change in stocks outstanding = 36,356,357 -2,475,423 = 33,880,934 stocks

7 0

3 years ago

Calculation of EPS and retained earnings Everdeen Mining, Inc., ended 2019 with net profits before taxes of $ 436 comma 000. T

ryzh [129]

Answer:

A) $ 1,65 are the 2019 EPS

B) $ 144.4400 go to retained earning after paid dividens of 0,80 per share.

Please see details below:

Explanation:

Net Income BEFORE Taxes $436.000

Tax RATE 21% -$91.560

Net Income after Taxes $344.440

Preferred Stock -$64.000

Subtotal $ 280.440 >> 280.440/170.000= $1,65 2019 EPS

Dividends $0,80/Shares: 170.000*0,8= $136.000

Subtotal $ 144.440 >> Retained Earnings

8 0

4 years ago

Mary and John, a young couple, come to you asking for financial advice. They recently graduated and have found entry-level posit

dolphi86 [110]

a) The lump-sum investment means that the young couple, Mary and John, will invest the total sum of $54,000 (18 x $3,000) at the beginning of the investment period, which yields a future value worth $154,134.31 at the end of the 18-year investment period,

On the other hand, the annuity investment of $3,000 implies that Mary and John will invest $3,000 annually, which yields a future value worth $98,279.98 at the end of the 18-year investment period.

b) The advantage of the lump-sum investment strategy over the annuity investment lies in the total interest generated, which is also compounded over the years.

Interest compounding means that Mary and John would be earning interest on interest.

The disadvantage of the lump-sum strategy, which becomes the advantage of the annuity investment, is that Mary and John may not afford the lump-sum at the beginning of the investment.

c) Since Mary and John could only afford to invest $3,000 annually, they should go ahead with the annuity investment.

The recommendation of the investment strategy is based on the financial status of Mary and John at the beginning of the investment because they are:

Financially literate
Moderate risk-takers.

<h3>What is future value?</h3>

The future value of an investment is the value of the cash flows in a future period. The future values of each investment strategy can be determined using the following future value formula:

FV = PV (1+r)^{n}

FV = future value

PV = present value

r = annual interest rate

{n} = number of periods interest held

Alternatively, it can be computed using an online finance calculator as follows:

Data and Calculations:

Lump-sum investment:

N (# of periods) = 18 years

I/Y (Interest per year) = 6%

PV (Present Value) = $54,000

PMT (Periodic Payment) = $0

Results:

FV = $154,134.31

Total Interest = $100,134.31

Annuity Investment:

N (# of periods) = 18 years

I/Y (Interest per year) = 6%

PV (Present Value) = $0

PMT (Periodic Payment) = $3,000

Results:

FV = $98,279.98

Sum of all periodic payments = $54,000 (18 x $3,000)

Total Interest = $44,279.98

Learn more about lump-sum and annuity investments at brainly.com/question/16522689

4 0

3 years ago