Answer:
A.
The output will rise by more than it did when the previous unit was added.
Explanation:
At $315,789 the house must be sold after taking into consideration the broker's commission.
<h3>What do you mean by broker’s commission?</h3>
A broker’s commission is a brokerage firm employee who is compensated for the number of trades they execute for clients.
These brokers typically earn a percentage of the assets traded by their clients, which means that the more a client trades, the more money they make.
In order to calculate the selling price, we have to start with 100% minus a 5% commission, which is 95% or .95.
Take $300,000 and divide this amount by .95.
This will give the amount or the price at which we can sell the house which is $315,789.
Thus, At $315,789 the house must be sold after taking into consideration the broker's commission.
To learn more about broker's commission refer:
brainly.com/question/14838861
#SPJ1
Answer:
Depreciation for year 3 = $115518
BV = $57798
Explanation:
The modified accelerated cost recovery method employees a classification-based approach to depreciating certain assets, once classified are assigned respective rates of depreciation. for example, assets classified under automobiles, trucks and machinery are treated under 5-year MACRS and will be depreciated at 20%, 32%, 19.2% and so on.
In this question the bridge across Rio Grande being built by Del Norte Brick co is treated under 3-year MACRS, for which the rates are as follows:
33.33% for the first year
44.45% 2nd year
14.81% 3rd year
7.41% 4th year
We have been asked to determine 3rd years' depreciation and book value, determined as follows:
Depreciation year 1: $780000 33.33% = $259974
Depreciation year 2: $780000 44.45% = $346710
Depreciation year 3: $780000 14.81% = $115518
So the depreciation for year 3 = $115518
The book value is calculated as follows:
<em>Book value = cost - accumulated depreciation</em>
BV = $780000 - $722202
BV = $57798
Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.
* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.
Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false
Answer:
I don't know but don't delete my answer pls
Explanation:)
