1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babunello [35]
2 years ago
11

P-83=129 ?????????????????????????

Mathematics
2 answers:
snow_tiger [21]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

p = 212

Step-by-step explanation:

p-83=129

Add 83 to each side

p-83+83=129+83

p =212

Rashid [163]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:=212

Step-by-step explanation:

add 83 to both sides and then simplify

−83=129

p-83=129

p−83=129

−83+83=129+83

You might be interested in
Please solve, -7x+8=-4(x+1)​
omeli [17]

Answer: x=4

<u>Simplify both sides of the equation.</u>

<u></u>-7x+8=-4(x+1)\\-7x+8=(-4)(x)+(-4)(1)(Distribute)\\-7x+8=-4x+-4<u></u>

<u></u>

<u>Add 4x to both sides</u>

<u></u>-7x+8+4x=-4x-4+4x\\-3x+8=-4<u></u>

<u></u>

<u>Subtract 8 from both sides</u>

<u></u>-3x+8-8=-4-8\\-3x=-12

<u>Divide both sides by -3</u>

<u></u>-3x/-3=-12/-3\\x=4<u></u>

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will improving customer service result in higher stock prices for the companies providing the better service? "When a company’s
Orlov [11]

Question:

Company                           2007 Score          2008 Score

Rite Aid                                73                          76

Expedia                                75                          77

J.C. Penney                          77                          78

a. For Rite Aid, is the increase in the satisfaction score from 2007 to 2008 statistically  significant? Use α= .05. What can you conclude?

b. Can you conclude that the 2008 score for Rite Aid is above the national average of  75.7? Use α= .05.

c. For Expedia, is the increase from 2007 to 2008 statistically significant? Use α= .05.

d. When conducting a hypothesis test with the values given for the standard deviation,

sample size, and α, how large must the increase from 2007 to 2008 be for it to be statistically  significant?

e. Use the result of part (d) to state whether the increase for J.C. Penney from 2007 to  2008 is statistically significant.

Answer:

a. There is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the increase in satisfaction score for Rite Aid from 2007 to 2008 is statistically significant

b. There is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the 2008 Rite Aid score, is above the national average of 75.7

c. The statistical evidence support the claim of a significant increase from 2007 to 2008

d. 1.802 and above is significant

e. The increase of J. C. Penney from 2007 is not statistically significant.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have

n = 60

σ = 6

μ₁ = 73

μ₂ = 76

We put H₀ : μ₁ ≥ μ₂ and

Hₐ : μ₁ < μ₂

From which we have;

z=\frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}} = \frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_{}^{2} }{n_{}}}}}

Plugging in the values we have

z =  \frac{(73-76)}{\sqrt{\frac{2\times 6^{2} }{60_{}}}}} = -2.7386

The probability, P from z function computation gives;

P(Z < -2.7386) = 0.0031

Where we have P < α, we reject the null hypothesis meaning that there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the increase in satisfaction score for Rite Aid from 2007 to 2008 is statistically significant

b. To test here, we have

H₀ : μ ≤ 75.7

Hₐ : μ > 75.7

The test statistic is given as follows;

z=\frac{\bar{x}-\mu }{\frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n}}} = \frac{76-75.7 }{\frac{6 }{\sqrt{60}}} = 0.3873

Therefore, we have the probability, P given as the value for the function at z = 0.3873 that is we have;

P = P(Z > 0.3873) = P(Z < -0.3873) = 0.3493

Therefore, since P > α which is 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, that is there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that the 2008 Rite Aid score, is above the national average of 75.7

c. Here we put

Null hypothesis H₀ : μ₁ ≥ μ₂

Alternative hypothesis Hₐ : μ₁ < μ₂

The test statistic is given by the following equation;

z=\frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}} = \frac{(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_{}^{2} }{n_{}}}}}

Plugging in the values we have

z =  \frac{(75-77)}{\sqrt{\frac{2\times 6^{2} }{60_{}}}}} = -1.8257

The probability, P from z function computation gives;

P(Z < -1.8257) = 0.03394

The statistical evidence support the claim of a significant increase

d. For statistical significance at 0.05 significant level, we have z = -1.644854

Therefore, from;

z=\frac{(\bar{x_{1}}-\bar{x_{2}})-(\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}-\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}. we have;

z \times \sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2} }{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma _{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}} + (\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{} ={(\bar{x_{1}}-\bar{x_{2}})

Which gives

{(\bar{x_{1}}-\bar{x_{2}}) = z \times \sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_{}^{2} }{n_{}}}} + (\mu_{1}-\mu _{2} )}{}  = -1.644854 \times \sqrt{\frac{2\times 6_{}^{2} }{60_{}}}} + 0 = -1.802

Therefore an increase of 1.802 and above is significant

e. Based on the result of part d. we have for J.C. Penney from 2007 to 2008 an increase of 1  which is less than 1.802 at 5% significant level, is not significant.

5 0
3 years ago
What fraction represents the decimal 0.12
Lelechka [254]

3/25 is your answer

12/100-->

6/50-->

=3/25

Step-by-step explanation:


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I'm having a hard time on this problem. Plz help. Will mark brainliest.
Grace [21]

Answer:

<h2>y = 31</h2>

Step-by-step explanation:

We know: opposite angles in a parallelogram have the same measure.

Therefore we have the equation:

x+y=87+y            <em>subtract y from both sides</em>

x=87

We know: the sum of the angle measures in the triangle is 180°.

Therefore we have the equation:

42+(x+y)+20=180          <em>subtitute x = 87</em>

42+87+y+20=180

149+y=180              <em>subtract 149 from both sides</em>

y=31

7 0
2 years ago
What is the value of the exponential expression below? 36 1/2
Aleksandr [31]

36 1/2 = 6

Given: the exponential expression

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A product that is very labor intensive assembled at Boyds Aero Structure in Memphis has an average labor cost of $20/hr. Overhea
    15·1 answer
  • Rachel and her friends are making necklaces out of beads and straws. They plan to use 12 beads and 5 straws for each necklace. T
    13·1 answer
  • How can you tell when the LCM of two numbers will equal one of the numbers or equal the product of the numbers
    9·1 answer
  • Consider the function y= x^2 +4x-4.
    14·1 answer
  • Let g(x)=2x and h(x)=x^2+4 find the value. (hog)(a)
    14·1 answer
  • -9x + 15 = -48 ?????????????????????/
    5·1 answer
  • 40 minus 36 divided by 6 x 3
    12·1 answer
  • Jina's Coffee Shop makes a blend that is a mixture of two types of coffee. Type A coffee costs Jina $4.35 per pound, and type B
    14·1 answer
  • On a number line, where is the number -1 in relation to the number -7?
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me I <br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%7Bx%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20-%20%20%7By%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20%2B%204y%20-%204"
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!