Answer:
People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an expression of what kind of rights?A) natural lawB) riparian rightsC) real property rightsD) strict liability rightsE) environmental rights
Explanation:
it's RIPARIAN RIGHTS
MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST THANK YOU
Answer:
D. Strategies and goals that guide a nation's relations with other countries
According to the Act, a summary conviction carries a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a potential sentence of six months in jail if the person commits copyright infringement for the first time.
<h3>
How hard is it to sue for copyright infringement?</h3>
It's a challenging process, especially for independent contractors and small business owners. Even while the copyright violation may be emotionally upsetting, you should also take your financial losses into account.
According to the Copyright Act, criminal proceedings may be brought if the infringement is very severe. According to the Act, a summary conviction has a maximum fine of $25,000 and/or a maximum sentence of six months in jail, whereas an indictment-based conviction carries a maximum fine of $1 million and/or a maximum sentence of five years in jail.
Learn more about Copyright Infringement here:
brainly.com/question/16774161
#SPJ4
Answer:
3 basic rights.
1.Religious freedom
2. Freedom of speach
3. Freedom of the press
Explanation:
All of our rights even inalianable rights come with limits.
The only right that has no limits is the freedom of thought which is the same as religious freedom. You have the right to think and believe anything. But even that has restrictions on how you can act on your beliefs. Your religious beliefs are not a license to do anything related to that belief. You can't engage in human sacrifice as a ritual for the belief. You can't hide behind your religous beliefs as a sheild against prosecution for murder.
"Freedom of religion embraces two concepts, -freedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the nature of things the second cannot be. ~ <em>Cantwell v Connecticut.</em>
<em />
The freedom of speach also has limits. You can say anything but you can't yell fire in a crowded theater. Doing so could cause a stampede and endanger the lives of others. Likewise, we have an impeachment case before the Senate right now in which the former president incited a riot at the Capital complex that caused the death of 6 people. The question before the Senate is did the former President incite a riot causing death and destruction of public property?
The freedom of the press is a first amendment right. But that doesn't give a publisher the right to slander or print falsehood about another person. The freedom of assembly is another 1st amendment right, but there is a difference between a lawful and peaceful assembly and a riot that results in the death of 5 people and the destruction of property.
