Answer:
D. There were no significant effects.
Step-by-step explanation:
The table below shows the representation of the significance level using the two-way between subjects ANOVA.
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value
Factor A 10 1 10 0.21 0.660
Factor B 50 2 25 0.52 0.6235
A × B 40 2 20 0.42 0.6783
Error 240 5 48 - -
Total 340 10 - - -
From the table above , the SS(B) is determined as follows:
SS(B) = SS(Total)-SS(Error-(A×B)-A)
= 340-(240-40-10)
= 50
A researcher computes the following 2 x 3 between-subjects ANOVA;
k=2
n=3
N(total) = no of participants observed in each group =11
df for Factor A= (k-1)
=(2-1)
=1
df for Factor B = (n-1)
=(3-1)
=2
df for A × B
= 2 × 1
= 2
df factor for total
=(N-1)
=11-1
=10
MS = SS/df
Thus, from the table, the P-Value for all data is greater than 0.05, therefore we fail to reject H₀.
Answer:
$49.18
Step-by-step explanation:
Dinner cost $38.95 before tax and tip are included.
Directions say to ADD 7% tip first so,
38.95 multiplied by 7%= 2.7265, Round up to $2.73
ADD $38.95 and $2.73 tax= $41.68
Now, multiply $41.68 by 18% to find the tip amount
$41.68 * 18%= 7.5024, Round to $7.50
ADD $41.68 and $7.50 to get answer: $49.18
Answer:
C. I & III
Step-by-step explanation:
I simplifies to ...
2(6x +15 -5x) +4 = 40
12x +30 -10x +4 = 40
2x +34 = 40
__
II simplifies to ...
40 = 2(15 -x) +4
40 = 30 -2x +4
40 = -2x +34 . . . . . . not equivalent to I (sign of x-term is different)
__
III simplifies to ...
12x +30 -10x +4 = 40
2x +34 = 40 . . . . . . equivalent to I
___
I & III are equivalent
The expression for the perimeter of the rectangle is 2(11c - 11d)
Perimeter of a rectangle = 2(length + width)
Length = 3c - 9d
Length = 3c - 9d Width = 8c - 2d
The expression for the perimeter can be expressed thus :
2(3c - 9d + 8c - 2d)
Collect like terms :
2(3c + 8c - 9d - 2d)
2(11c - 11d)
Hence, the expression for the perimeter of the rectangle is 2(11c - 11d)
Learn more : brainly.com/question/2142493?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
D.32
Step-by-step explanation:
25-18=7
18-11=7
11-4=7
