Answer:
- I ate spaghetti for dinner
- I like painting
Explanation:
hopefully these are the answers that you're looking for lol
The bridge cost to much to build... hope this helps
Into the room , Paul walked
Answer:
I think the best bet here is option C.
Explanation:
Option A is straighforward, but it is very vauge in explination as to why they didn't accept the person for the job. The question asked to be clear. Option B does give clear explination, but isn't very kind toward the job applicant. The same occurs in Option D, it's remotley vauge and a bit rude.
The inference is that the writer used a subject-by-subject comparison strategy in the passage as D. The writer compares and contrasts both kinds of shopping in each paragraph.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given in a literary work.
The subject by subject comparison is the discussion of each subject separately but still using the same basis of comparison to select the points and arrange them in order.
In this case, the inference is that the writer used a subject-by-subject comparison strategy in the passage as the writer compares and contrasts both kinds of shopping in each paragraph
Note that the complete question wasn't found and the option was chosen based on the information given.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
