1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
QveST [7]
3 years ago
12

Need help explaining why this happens

Mathematics
1 answer:
Charra [1.4K]3 years ago
8 0
Just like 2 squared = 4, the square root of 2 multiplied by itself will result in a product of 2. Squaring a number always means multiplying that number by the same number.
You might be interested in
Trevor has $9100 in an investment account. He withdrew all of his money from the account. He spent $1100 on a plane ticket to Pa
Ilya [14]

Answer:

$6,400

Step-by-step explanation:

9100-1100

8000

8000×1/5

$1600

8000-1600

$6,400

3 0
2 years ago
Linda and juan went shopping. Linda spent $19 less than Juan. If we let x represent how much juan spent, write an algebraic expr
Agata [3.3K]
The answer to this question would be x-19
5 0
3 years ago
A political pollster conducted a study to determine political party loyalty. To do so, he selected a random sample of 100 regist
Reika [66]

Answer: (a)

P - Value = 0.0981 is high, this indicates stronger evidence that we should fail to reject the null hypothesis: H0: pD = pR (There is no significant difference between the proportion of Democrats who plan to vote for the Democratic candidate in the upcoming election and the proportion of Republicans who plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election). P - Value = 0.0981 is the probability of obtaining results at least as extreme as the observed results of the Hypothesis Test, assuming that the null hypothesis is correct.

(b)

Since P - Value = 0.0981 is greater than \alpha = 0.05, the difference is not significant. Fail to reject null hypothesis.

(c)

Since in the Hypothesis Test, we have failed to reject null hypothesis, we could have made: Type II Error: Failure to reject a false null hypothesis. One potential consequence of this error is as follows:

Suppose in reality there is significant difference between the proportion of Democrats who plan to vote for the Democratic candidate in the upcoming election and the proportion of Republicans who plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election. But the political pollster wrongly concludes that there is no significant difference between the proportion of Democrats who plan to vote for the Democratic candidate in the upcoming election and the proportion of Republicans who plan to vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election. Type II Error is committed in this situation. The consequence of this Type II Error is that the political pollstar will that the political parties are loyal and will not do any follow up work whereas in reality it is not so.

Step-by-step explanation:

got this from chegg!!!

5 0
3 years ago
he number of surface flaws in plastic panels used in the interior of automobiles has a Poisson distribution with a mean of 0.02
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

a) 98.01%

b) 13.53\%

c) 27.06%

Step-by-step explanation:

Since a car has 10 square feet of plastic panel, the expected value (mean) for a car to have one flaw is 10*0.02 = 0.2  

If we call P(k) the probability that a car has k flaws then, as P follows a Poisson distribution with mean 0.2,

P(k)= \frac{0.2^ke^{-0.2}}{k!}

a)

In this case, we are looking for P(0)

P(0)= \frac{0.2^0e^{-0.2}}{0!}=e^{-0.2}=0.9801=98.01\%

So, the probability that a car has no flaws is 98.01%

b)

Ten cars have 100 square feet of plastic panel, so now the mean is 100*0.02 = 2 flaws every ten cars.

Now P(k) is the probability that 10 cars have k flaws and  

P(k)= \frac{2^ke^{-2}}{k!}

and  

P(0)= \frac{2^0e^{-2}}{0!}=0.1353=13.53\%

And the probability that 10 cars have no flaws is 13.53%

c)

Here, we are looking for P(1) with P defined as in b)

P(1)= \frac{2^1e^{-2}}{1!}=2e^{-2}=0.2706=27.06\%

Hence, the probability that at most one car has no flaws is 27.06%

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the greatest common factor of 63135
Morgarella [4.7K]
It would be 63135 because that is the highest number you can multiply it into
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Cancel membership how help
    7·1 answer
  • Help me writing and solving the inequality for each problem.
    11·1 answer
  • Help! I cant solve this
    11·2 answers
  • Which table represents the increasing linear function with the greatest rate
    14·1 answer
  • ZABD and ZDBC are supplementary angles.
    10·2 answers
  • Plants must break down the sugar in cells to obtain energy from the food that is produced. What is this
    7·2 answers
  • What is the approximate percent decrease from 1,865 to 1,240?
    11·2 answers
  • Find the zeros of the function y=x(x+2)(x-4)
    11·1 answer
  • Which number has an absolute value greater than 4?
    14·1 answer
  • Please answer this math problem sceenshot below
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!