Answer: initiative versus guilt
Explanation:
After trying unsuccessfully,he realizes he should tell his parents while in the soccer clinic he feels more accepted there wasn't a feeling of guilt in him
Tens of thousands of people were killed as they demonstrated their desire for Bash al-Assad to resign as president of Syria and for political reforms to be enacted. In the months following the start of revolutionary activities tens of thousands of Syrians were killed. The situation worsened and eventually devolved into a massive civil war that continues today.
Karius, a schoolteacher, is an advocate of the constructivist approach to instruction. Given this information, it can be said that karius is most likely to "Encourage children to collaborate in their efforts to learn and understand."
<h3>What is constructivism?</h3>
Constructivism is defined as "a learning method that maintains that people actively create or make their own education and that truth is determined by the learner's experiences."
Some characteristics of constructivism are-
- Arends (1998) elaborates constructivist principles by stating as constructivism believes in the learner's personal production of meaning through experience, but that meaning is determined by the interaction of past knowledge and new occurrences.
- The core notion of constructivism is that human cognition is created, that learners to build new information on the base of existing knowledge.
- The prior knowledge influences the new or modified knowledge that an individual constructs as a result of fresh learning experiences.
- Learners basically use their foreknowledge as a foundation & build on it with new information.
To know more about constructivism, here
brainly.com/question/11144228
#SPJ4
Answer:
Luther also sent a copy to Archbishop Albert Albrecht of Mainz, calling on him to end the sale of indulgences. Aided by the printing press, copies of the 95 Theses spread throughout Germany within two weeks and throughout Europe within two months.
Explanation:
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
