Answer:
The correct answer is:
Government should either raise its <u>expenditures</u> or cut<u> taxes</u>. I believe the government spending multiplier is <u>greater</u> than the tax multiplier, so I favor <u>this policy</u>.
Explanation:
To begin with, an <em>"expansionary fiscal policy" </em>represents the tool that a government has in order to give response to a recessionary context in where the economy is falling down by decreasing its production. That is why, that in this type of policy the actions that are to be taken comprehends the reduction of taxes that the public sector collects from the private sector and also to increase the public expenditures that the government has with the purpose to estimulate the demand and offer of goods.
Answer:
The business manager should assume that the building expense is fixed.
Explanation:
Fixed costs are not correlated with the revenue levels. Within the relevant range, fixed costs remain constant. They do not vary with the activity levels as variable costs do. For example, a manufacturer must pay for rent, repairs and maintenance, and utility bills irrespective of the revenue levels at which it is operating. This is why the business manager always discovers that the building expense each month does not correlate with the revenue levels, unlike the product's variable costs.
If increased government spending spurs a short-run expansion. The statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
<h3>What is aggregate supply?</h3>
Aggregate supply can be defined as the overall amount of goods and service that a firm intend to produce and supply at a point in time or at a particular period of time.
If an increase in government spending lead to short run expansion this means that there will be shift in aggregate supply of goods and service as aggregate supply will tend to shift to the left.
Therefore the statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
Learn more about aggregate supply here:brainly.com/question/19802257
#SPJ1
Answer:
The primary difference between those two concepts is focus that each term has. The first one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the level of return. While the second one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the amount of factors used for that production.
Explanation:
One the one hand, the law of diminishing marginal returns is a concept known in the microeconomics theory due to the fact that it establishes the relationship between the productivity and the income for every aspect of it. Meaning that, when the productivity increases because of the increase of only one factor of production then the income will start to slowly decrease, confirming that when only one factor is increased the production will start to be incomplete and the return will decrease for that.
On the other hand, the law of diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution indicates the relationship between the level of output and the different factor used to produce. Meaning that, it shows how to keep the level of output the same while making changes in the amount of factors used.
Answer: $5,500
Explanation:
The Cost of Goods available for sale is the price of the inventory and purchases that the company intends to sell.
June 1 Inventory = $1,000
June 12 Purchase = $2,400
June 23 Purchase = $2,100
Cost of goods available for sale = 1,000 + 2,400 + 2,100
= $5,500
