<span>This was a form of positive reinforcement. She has been conditioned to work harder when she receives the praise, because she enjoys hearing this from her superiors. When the reward is given to her, the cycle continues: more praise leads to harder work, which leads to even more praise.</span>
Answer: Culturally consistent decisions
Explanation:
The options are:
a The organizational structure
b The environmental complexity
c Behavioral substitutions
d Culturally consistent decisions
Heidi Ganahl's life story helps the employees and franchisees of Camp Bow Wow understand culturally consistent decisions.
Organizational stories are being told by people in order to recall certain things that has happened in an organization and to also emphasize culturally consistent decisions, assumptions, and actions.
Answer:
Ans. The value of investment after 2 years is $3,155.51
Explanation:
Hi, first we need toconvert that 9.80 percent, compounded quarterly into an effective quarterly rate, that is just by dividing by 4, since there are 4 quarters in a year, that is:
r(effective quarterly)= 9.8%/4 =2.45%
Now, since the rate is effective quarterly, the periods (time of the invesmet) has to be in quarters, so we multiply 2 years by 4 and we get 8 quarters.
With all the above information, we can go ahead and use the following formula in order to find the future value of this investment.
![FutureValue=PresentValue*(1+r)^{n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=FutureValue%3DPresentValue%2A%281%2Br%29%5E%7Bn%7D)
It should all look like this.
![FutureValue=2,600*(1+0.0245)^{8}=3,155.51](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=FutureValue%3D2%2C600%2A%281%2B0.0245%29%5E%7B8%7D%3D3%2C155.51)
So, the future value of this investment is $3,155.51
Best of luck.
Peyton is engaging in a sales strategy in which he would likely tell of the buyer that the land will increase twice as much in the following year if it has not been brought in which this strategy will be able to lure the buyer into thinking of whether he or she will buy the land or not.
Answer:
Yes, the machine should be replaced
Explanation:
The calculation is given below:
<u>
Particulars old Machine New machine
</u>
Purchase price $300,000
Less:
Salvage value -$80,000
Operating cost $400,000 $144,000
($100,000 × 4 ) ($36,000 × 4)
Total cost $400,000 $364,000
Hence, the financial advantage is
= $400,000 - $364,000
= $36,000
As there is a financial advantage of $36,000 therefore the old machine would be replaced with the new machine