<em>Atlas Shrugged - The Trilogy</em>
You know when you're sick and need something mindless to watch? And the thing you pick turns out to be so terrible that you almost become sicker? That describes the Atlas Shrugged trilogy.
I could spend hours going on about how bad this movie was but here are some of the lowlights.
First off...the cast changes from movie to movie...not the characters the actors playing them. Whether it was because the people making the films were running out of money and the subsequent sequels were budgeted lower grade I don't know but...it was a wee bit off putting.
Secondly...the whole trilogy is shot in some sort of soft focus sort of thing more reminiscent of softcore entertainment from the 90s. Maybe it was intended to make it more sci-fi-ish or something but...again...no clue.
Thirdly...the dialogue. I have never ready Ayn Rand's work nor do I care to but...my god...if these movies are even a faint reflection of her work then it so so heavy handed and over the top that it's more than slightly cringeworthy.
Fourthly the editing was/is atrocious. Characters appear and disappear almost at will. Little explanation is given to motive or...anything.
I freely admit I watched it until the end out of...self loathing or something I don't know but...if you don't want to make yourself even sicker...avoid it at all costs.
Hello, the answer to your question is Jim Gallien
Answer:
b
Explanation:
A clause is the part of a sentence that necessarily includes a verb to express the action of the sentence and also a subject that performs that action. While the verb is always explicitly states, the subject can be understood and not mentioned in the written sentence.
A clause, however, does not always make sense on its one. An independent clause can indeed stand alone as a sentence, but a dependent clause only forms part of a sentence and does no make sense by itself.
The volcanoes section <span>of the Ready.gov website is </span>there to inform people that volcanoes erupt and when they do, it causes wide-ranged cataclysmic events which are often dangerous to any form of life around its danger zone. This section of the page also informs visitors the course of action which must be done to survive a cataclysmic event. It also describes in detail the signs to look for to determine whether or not the volcanoe/s in observation is/are in danger of erupting. Also, visiting this section will make you think wether or not you should consider living in a volcanoe-surrounded area.
I disagree of open book tests being harder than traditional tests; what is open book tests to you? <em>On every answer do you get to cheat to use your book? </em>I disagree, because on the final tests <em>or the STAAR tests, </em>you won't be using <u>open book.</u> What will you do then, if you only use open book? Traditional tests you won't have any book, not one. What will you do then, if you switched from always open books to a normal, better traditional test? <u>Students need to be more prepared; schools can't </u><em><u>let</u></em><u> them cheat. Open book tests are just something the teachers give to their students to make it easier.</u> This is why I believe open book tests are much <em>easier </em> than traditional tests, that is why I fully disagree when you say that Open Book tests are harder than traditional test.
Can I have brainliest or no
