Answer: The second part of the argument does not follow logically from the first part.
Answer:
B. Toast popped out of the silver toaster, was seized by a spidery metal hand that drenched it with melted butter.
D. She had both ears plugged with electronic bees that were humming the hour away. She looked up suddenly, saw him, and nodded.
Explanation:
"Fahrenheit 450" is a dystopian novel written by Ray Bradbury. The novel is set in future, where the citizen are programmized by technology and books are banned.
The statements that shows that the novel is set in future are:
B. Toast popped out of the silver toaster, was seized by a spidery metal hand that drenched it with melted butter.
D. She had both ears plugged with electronic bees that were humming the hour away. She looked up suddenly, saw him, and nodded.
These two statements show the technological advancement in the society. For instance, a machine applying butter over toasted bread.
I guess it would either be mood or syntax
Answer + Explanation:
As the society grows more and more health conscious, stronger voices to ban smoking in all public areas begin to emerge. Banning public has been used as a mean for government to discourage smoking and also to improve city image. It is almost impossible to achieve consensus on this issue as it creates great inconvenience for the smokers. However, I believe smoking should be banned in public places and my reasons are as follow.
Looking at the <em>health aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because it is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the others. Cigarette is a known carcinogen that has been associated with increased rates of lung cancer and heart disease. However, the hazard does not end there, second-hand smoke has been proven to create more detrimental effects on health on both the smokers and the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immune systems such as children and elderly.
Looking at the <em>sociological aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because smoking is a personal choice. One’s personal enjoyment should not be at the expense of others’ health. When a person smokes in indoor public areas such as restaurants and shopping centres, pollutants continue to circulate the premise and affecting the health of everyone within the building. It is unfair for the non-smokers to be forced to share the health risks of the smokers.
To sum up, public places are shared by all, smokers and non-smokers, old and young, and should be made friendly to all. <u>Negative effects of smoking go beyond the smoker himself, creating health problems of the public.</u> While some choose to accept the side effects of smoking, risks of smoking should not be forced upon others. Therefore, in my humble opinions, smoking should be banned in public places.
A word-for-word reference to a text is called a direct quotation.
