I think you either add all of the sides or multiply but i think you multiply
Answer:
x = 6
Step-by-step explanation:
6 x 6 = 36
36 - 36 = 0
Answer:
0 tests
Yes, this procedure is better on the average than testing everyone, it makes it less cumbersome.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the information:
Let P be the probability that a randomly selected individual has the disease = 0.1. N individuals are randomly selected, thereafter, blood samples of each person would be tested after combining all specimens. Should in case one person has the disease then it yields a positive result and test should be set for each person.
Let Y be number tests
For n = 3 there are two possibilities. If no one has the disease then the value is 1 otherwise the value is 4, here P = 0.1
Therefore, for Y = 1
P(Y-1) = P(no one has disease)
= 0.9³
= 0.729
If Y = 4
P(Y-4) = 1-P(y = 1)
= 1 - 0.729 = 0.271
The expected number of tests using this formular gives
E(Y) = 1×0.729 + 4×0.271
E(Y) = 0
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1
Answer:
For example: 0=1 This is false because we know zero can't equal one. Therefore we can conclude that the problem has no solution. You can solve this as you would any other equation. 13x−5(x−4)=8x+513x−5x+20=8x+58x+20=8x+58x−8x+20=8x−8x+520=5 We see this is a false statement because 20 does not equal 5.
Step-by-step explanation:
number 2 the answer is b
