1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lemur [1.5K]
3 years ago
15

Tony advertises a 2014 Honda Civic car for sale at $12,999 on a website known as ‘Koala Car Sales’. Mike reads the advertisement

. He is interested and so calls Tony. Tony invites him to inspect the car, giving him the address. After inspecting the car, Mike says ‘I will give you $7,000 for this car.’ Tony responds, ‘That’s no good. I would want at least $10,000 as those tyres and rims are worth $4,500.’ Mike replies, ‘Sorry mate but it isn’t worth that much to me.’ Three weeks later Mike sees the same advertisement on the same website but this time selling the car for $10,500. Mike phones Tony and say ‘I would be prepared to pay $5,500.’ Tony laughs and says ‘How about we go back to your original price of $7,000. We have a deal.’ Discuss the legal effect of each communication and determine if an agreement was formed. Assuming there was an agreement reached between Tony and Mike, discuss whether it would be supported by the necessary intention and consideration to be recognised as a contract.
Law
1 answer:
Degger [83]3 years ago
6 0

The esthetic value seems to be that you will sell your automobile to a bidder who pays this sum besides $7000. In the absence of their action, almost all participants would have the opportunity to legitimately execute the agreement.

  • The supplier will therefore offer the purchaser a stipulated sum of money to own his automobile. The $7000 deal would be defined as concluded whenever the participants decided to accept one another as a kind of compensation.
  • Furthermore, although both have made their decision on compensation and are going to be making something in a document, it's indeed actionable at court.

It would then be termed a long-term contract, in which both mainstream parties are willing to deal with one other and therefore have committed to perform their share.

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/15681141

You might be interested in
In what situations would a defendant be wise to take a plea deal? Why do you think a prosecutor want to make a plea bargain offe
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

If they feel like they are going to get out in prison or if they think that they are about to be proven guilty. they may make a plea deal so they can get the defendants help if they know something the prosecutor needs to know for the case.

4 0
3 years ago
The fifteenth amendment guaranteed _______________ for all us citizens, regardless of previous condition of servitude.
amm1812

The fifteenth amendment guaranteed "right to vote" for all us citizens, regardless of previous condition of servitude.

<h3>What was 15th amendment of US constitution?</h3>

The 15th Amendment, passed by Congress on February 26, 1869 and ratified on February 3, 1870, granted African American men the right to vote.

Some key features regarding the 15th amendment of US constitution are-

  • The 15th Amendment, enacted in 1870, appeared to former abolitionists and the Radical Republicans in Congress who shaped Reconstruction after the Civil War to signify the satisfaction of all promises to African Americans.
  • After being set free by the 13th Amendment and granted citizenship even by 14th Amendment, Black males have been granted the right to vote by the 15th Amendment.
  • In retrospect, the 15th Amendment was merely another step in the fight for equality that would endure more than a century already when African Americans could fully participate in American public as well as civic life.

To know more about the 15th amendment of US constitution, here

brainly.com/question/620540

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Mike lives in a country in which the government owns all the property and controls all the natural resources; he likely lives in
Igoryamba
Communist country I believe.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Define and describe human rights violation​
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

When you can't speak out for your race and who you want to be and how we live our life. Hope this helps.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain what Barnaby Jack meant when he said, “Sometimes you have to demo a threat to spark a solution”.
Sophie [7]
Answer

When Barnaby Jack said, “Sometimes you have to demo a threat to spark a solution,” he meant that sometimes, if there isn't a problem, there would be no reason to find a solution. By demoing a threat, then there would show that there is room for a problem, meaning there needs to be a way to fix it.

Explanation

Done
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How the Bill of Rights is supposed to protect defendants from situations like the Scottsboro boys case. What has happened betwee
    14·1 answer
  • What is democracy according to Abraham lincoln​
    8·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP PLEASEE!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Write a hypothesis for Part I of the lab, which is about the effect on an object being carried by a car, when the car experience
    15·1 answer
  • Necesito 3 ejemplos de objetos de actos juridicos ejemplo de un acto celebrado por escritura publica/intervencion de oficial pub
    7·1 answer
  • What organization contains the Women, Infants, and Children program?
    12·1 answer
  • A law office manager assists the attorney with the delivery of legal services.. Group of answer choices
    10·1 answer
  • Is this statement true or false? the 14th amendment weakened the power of the states. It gave the federal government the power t
    10·2 answers
  • A person charged with a crime has a constitutional right to: A. receive a trial by jury . B. demand a trial in federal court . C
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following people is the best-known example of a policy entrepreneur?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!