1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iris [78.8K]
3 years ago
9

Explain what Barnaby Jack meant when he said, “Sometimes you have to demo a threat to spark a solution”.

Law
1 answer:
Sophie [7]3 years ago
6 0
Answer

When Barnaby Jack said, “Sometimes you have to demo a threat to spark a solution,” he meant that sometimes, if there isn't a problem, there would be no reason to find a solution. By demoing a threat, then there would show that there is room for a problem, meaning there needs to be a way to fix it.

Explanation

Done
You might be interested in
What are the three names that Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18 called?
mel-nik [20]

Answer:

18: To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
*****
wel

Answer:

I think check and balance

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The types of cases a court can hear is referred to as its
vivado [14]

Answer:

The answer is D: Jurisdiction

Explanation:

I learned this in a lesson, I just remembered it.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is a written set of instructions that tells a bank how to use money to pay someone.
Alex_Xolod [135]

\boxed{A\:check    } is a written set of instructions that tells a bank how to use money to pay someone.

\bold{ \green{ \star{ \orange{Mystique35}}}}⋆

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who supports judicial restraint?
balu736 [363]

Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.

<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>

A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.

<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>

They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.

Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Arguments about denial of abs-cbn franchise
    7·1 answer
  • _________ sentencing involves a judge increasing sanctions and conditions imposed on an offender
    5·1 answer
  • In order to help support the commanders' decision-making process, the staff must understand the commanders' information needs. W
    13·1 answer
  • Why are sovereignty, legitimacy and jurisdiction important in a successful government?
    13·1 answer
  • You call in a special favor to your friend at the FBI, and she runs the DNA samples through CODIS. A match returns. It appears t
    14·1 answer
  • Searches at the border of people entering the country are subject to reasonable suspicion, probable cause or a warrant.
    13·2 answers
  • Please help, i need to have this done today....
    9·1 answer
  • Who carries out policy under the Commission Form of Government
    8·1 answer
  • What types of accomplishments make some prisedents better than others?
    5·1 answer
  • How many senators must vote for a motion of cloture?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!