Tia Salon

Chris and Jordan are a two-person household. Chris's market hourly wage is $40, but Chris can also produce $20 of household prod

andrezito [222]

Answer:

A. Jordan specializes in household production, while Chris specializes in marketplace work.

Explanation:

Chris and Jordan both can work for their household. The best way is to achieve maximum utility by using the combination of their skills. Chris can go for household work and Jordan can go for marketplace work. They both can use combination of their specialization to achieve maximum utility.

6 0

3 years ago

Assume that the governance committee states that all projects costing more than $70,000 must be reviewed and approved by the chi

rodikova [14]

Answer:

The correct answer is the difference between governance and management oversight.

Explanation:

In conflict and post-conflict situations it is necessary that the security sector is governed by the principles of effective governance and accountability, to prevent this sector from misusing its prerogatives, that the authorities abuse its control over the actors in the security sector and, above all, to build public confidence and establish or restore the legitimacy of the sector (UNODC, 2011). For this to happen, it is necessary that the security sector actors accept that their decisions and actions can be questioned and that any inappropriate behavior can have consequences such as compensation for victims or sanctions. Without this type of accountability and transparency, corruption and other inappropriate behavior can flourish (UNODC, 2011).

4 0

3 years ago

On January 1, year 4, Purl Corp. purchased, as a long-term investment, $500,000 face value Shaw, Inc. 8% bonds for $456,200. The

Alla [95]

Answer:

$468,000

Explanation:

Since the bonds will be held to maturity and purchased at a discount, their value will increase as maturity approaches. On December 31, year 5, the bonds should be reported at $468,002 ≈ $468,000

investment balance = $456,200 + $5,620 (difference between interest receivable and interest revenue 2004) +$6,182 (difference between interest receivable and interest revenue 2005) = $468,002

interest receivable 2004 = $500,000 x 8% = $40,000

interest revenue 2004 = $456,200 x 10% = $45,620

difference 2004 = $45,620 - $40,000 = $5,620

interest receivable 2005 = $500,000 x 8% = $40,000

interest revenue 2005 = ($456,200 + $5,620) x 10% = $46,182

difference 2005 = $46,182 - $40,000 = $6,182

6 0

3 years ago

You are the CFO of a publicly-traded company in a very competitive industry. You are preparing the annual report and SEC filings

tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

Investors structure is a significant part of an organization. In this manner, it is important to provide the significant data so they can take inform decision. The yearly report give the imperative data the utilization of which they can shape solid justification for taking choices. In any case, most of the time, dominant part of the investors/speculators barely spend their valuable time on examining every single figure gave in the financials. They experience the nuts and bolts and basics as it were. In this manner just material realities must be unveiled in the reports as contenders might be peering toward on the subtleties. That is, it is significant not to reveal the "exchange insider facts" of the organization in its reports. A lot of data prompts data over-burden with which contenders may exploit. It ought to likewise be dealt with that what must be incorporated is incorporated as a general rule.

3 0

3 years ago

Samuel, a longtime employee of the ABCD Corporation, was injured when he fell off a ladder while stocking widgets at ABDC at the

ozzi

Answer:

Option B. He will win

Explanation:

If Samuel is desiring to sue his employer in a circuit court because he thinks that the employer was negligent then he will have to sue under negligence Act, which says that the employer is obliged to take all necessary precautions and if found negligent then the court may apply contributory negligent theory as well as comparative negligent theory. These two negligent theories means that the employer was partly responsible for injury, which means that this would result in compensation to Samuel.

Hence it is more likely that Samuel will win the case.

7 0

3 years ago