Answer:
Number 1 is the opinion.
Explanation:
Number 2, Number 3, and Number 4 all are supported with sufficient evidence.
In Number 2, the passage refers to a real-life property, the "intellectual property", and therefore supports the sentence, providing a clear argument that the song is copyrighted.
In Number 3, the passage refers to judges and juries comparing different parts of the song. This is also what would happen in a real-life situation since copyright laws have strict policies equipped within them.
In Number 4, it provides an exact date to when the incident happened with Katy Perry and the people who have worked with her.
However, in Number 1, only because "the melody of the two songs sounding different" is not sufficient evidence for the audience to believe that the song is not copyrighted. More evidence is needed in order for this claim to be stronger.
Hope this helped!
~Jinachi~
Answer:
1. While he ate, my cousin Rob told us where him and Josh had camped.
2. Rob, who is in college, had taken my nine year old brother camping.
3. Rob had photos on his phone of the lovely lake near their campsite.
4. We put a drawing of the lake that Josh had made on the fridge.
The Greenberg article shares research about Marshall, while the informational text is based on an interview.
Answer: C
Explanation: I got it right
True, although interjections of comical relief are very commonplace near the beginning of most trageties
