D Cause and Effect
A virus causes a cold and carelessness causes errors
For the duration of the early stone age period all societies Egyptians, romans, Greeks, druids derived from the nomadic tribes founded in the continent of africa. Because of this historical point of origination archaeologists have resolute decisively that human existences have an interventionist agenda whether out of requisite for provisions, rival factions or competing groups or simply to offer claim to property we as homo erectus have discovered our world and sought to manipulate it to our will. That having been asserted because of this causal effect many geographical locations have relatively almost all at one time or another been inhabited by an ancient or modern society and this has given rise ultimately to commerce, agricultural development and the ubiquitous of crops all significant to lasting clearing and thus influential and manipulative of our dominance over the elements. <span />
The way in which Plato and More discuss members of the ruling class differently is D. Plato tries to remedy the social divide, while more provides a plan for their governing style.
<h3>What is a Ruling Class?</h3>
This refers to the hierarchy of rule that allows a group of elites to be in charge of the governing of the people,.
Hence, we can see that The way in which Plato and More discuss members of the ruling class differently is D. Plato tries to remedy the social divide, while more provides a plan for their governing style.
Read more about Plato here:
brainly.com/question/742055
#SPJ1
Answer:
The conclusion is false, because it is assuming that correlation = causation.
Explanation:
An important principle in statistical analysis is the principle that when correlation exist between two variables or more, it does not mean that one of the variables are causing the other to appear in a certain manner.
Remember that correlation means that you are investigating whether a relationships exists between two variables; in this example, as we can see, it is between the biodiversity in an ecosystem and the population of an insect.
The graph can be said to illustrate the result of the research; that as the biodiversity of the ecosystem goes down, the insect's population goes up. This is a form of negative correlation.
However - we do not know what is the direction of the relationship; the student concludes that as some insects die within the ecosystem, the researched insect's population goes up; assuming that the predator species died off and thus the researched insect's population increases.
Yet, it is also possible for the relationship to go towards the other direction; the researched insect population increases - perhaps by the introduction of a new food source that causes the species' population to increase - and thus, this damages the biodiversity of the ecosystem, making the population go down since it is possible that the researched insect is instead the species which is on top of the food chain at that ecosystem.
To investigate the direction of a relationship, further research need to be done and more sophisticated statistical methods need to be used.