In the short story "Top of the Food Chain", T. C. Boyle describes the efforts made by a company to eradicate malaria in Borneo, which is similar to the actions taken by the WHO around the 50's. In a satirical tone Boyle describes in first person the development of the actions taken and how they had a side effect creating a new problem to the population over and over again. Using this tone Boyle allows the reader to understand that the project is a failure since the beginning, they decided to use DDT to kill mosquitoes, even though it had been already banned in many other countries, the narrator, who is giving a report, explains it was an action taken because the WHO, and the government had asked for, "practically begged us", therefore, he does not feel guilty to have used such methods. Mosquitoes died, so as many more insects did, such as wasps (who ate caterpillars). Then comes the problem of caterpillars that were feeding on the roofs of the villagers homes, this could depict the collapse of the houses and ecosystem as well. Next, they replaced the palm roofs for tin roofs. Consequently, there was a fly problem, that was corrected with the use of chemicals, then the geckos ate the dead flies and died as well, moreover the geckos were a feast to cats who ended up dying too. The villagers were sad, but then the rats infested the village and the crops. The last action was to send 14,000 cats from other countries, which were parachuted to the ground, unfortunately, due to the loss of crops many of them served as food. The narrator continues telling that the company's mistakes were accidents that could lead to positive aid programs in the future, Boyle states "to every cloud a silver lining" . We are able to understand that Boyle satirical tone could refer to communicate political criticism. His humor is attacking real programs who are not approved by him and many more people, it could be seen as a persuasive text, who leads the reader to think and analyse, as well as an entertaining text.
This text contains fallacious statements because the author is attacking his opponent.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
This refers to a faulty argument or a reason provided to support an idea but that has problems in its structure or meaning.
<h3>What type of fallacy can be found in this excerpt?</h3>
The main fallacy can be found in "My opponent, who uses her time to spread lies and rumors". This type of fallacy is known as the ad hominen and it is a faulty argument because the author attacks its opponent and believes this is a reason for people to support his plan.
Learn more about fallacy in: brainly.com/question/8900639
#SPJ1
The information you need to know regarding daytime sits is provided here.
No matter what you do, spending a lot of time sitting up increases your risk of illness and early mortality. Regardless of how often a person exercises, the amount of time they spend sitting down during the day is associated to a higher risk of developing heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and mortality.
The amount of time a person spends sitting during the day is associated with an increased risk of heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and mortality, even if they regularly exercise.
Overseeing the experiment was Dr. David Alter, a senior scientist at the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute. He said that more than half of the average person's day is spent sitting, watching television, or using a computer.
to learn about sits during the day from the link.
brainly.com/question/28502492
#SPJ9
Answer:
Explanation:
Freedom of expression is one of the major liberty afforded to citizens and residents of a nation being controlled by democratic rule. The freedom of expression allows citizens to air their concerns, make suggestions, and even make criticism about some government decisions which may seem overboard or unmeaningful to them without fear or apprehension of being trailed or punished on the basis of their utterances. These freedom of expression has however being taken overboard by some individuals, prompting the restrictions and regulations to these abused freedom afforded to citizens. It has been ovaervwd that some individuals are both careless and reckless with what they spew by saying and making declarations which are derogatory and defamatory against other individuals, religion, and tribes which are capable of inciting violence and undermining national security.
