Answer:
I believe that it should not have if they regarded their Monroe Doctrine which emphasized non-invovlement in European or global affaris unless it was attacked itself. This invovlement would have invalidated the agreement, and the surrounding American countries would then have an opprotunity to make power ploys. I do not know if htis is still prudent, but the threat of communism is itself a domestic threat, not relinquished in the global affaris as long as the national security remains more secure then the penetration force of such moves suggesting the Monroe Doctrine seemed more appropriate to follow then intervention.
Explanation:
The geographical features of the Roman Empire, such as the Tiber River, were advantageous for the expansion and world domination in the period.
<h3 /><h3>Why was the Roman Empire successful?</h3>
The place where Rome is inserted has contributed to the protection and supply of the population's needs, such as the mountain ranges where the city is built.
Therefore, the natural resources of rome contributed to its development and expansion in the period of the empire.
Find out more about Roman Empire here:
brainly.com/question/1892495
#SPJ1
The policy of detente means 3. a relaxation in tensions.
Answer:
Richard is known as Richard Cœur de Lion (Norman French: Le quor de lion) or Richard the Lionheart because of his reputation as a great military leader and warrior. ... Most of his life as king was spent on Crusade, in captivity, or actively defending his lands in France.
Explanation:
Richard III was a “great king” who achieved more than the Elizabeths and Henry V. Appearing on BBC Radio 4's Great Lives, Langley said Richard III was “most certainly” a great king who wanted to “make life fairer and more bearable” for ordinary people.
