Answer:
Yes this is against the Indian constitution.
Explanation:
This is actually against the constitution. The Constitution has made provision for equal rights to the law for everybody. All the citizens of India are equal before law. There is also equal protection of law to all by the Constitution. The constitution provides for the safety of its citizens and ensures everyone is accorded justice.
The Constitution does not provide for a minister to misuse his power. The minister misuses his power by asking the police not to register case against his relatives. and thus the later can not ask a police officer not to register a complaint against his relative. This is not in accordance with the principle of equality.
Answer:
It influenced the United States because the philosophy.
Explanation:
It drove 19th-century U.S. territorial expansion and was used to justify the forced removal of Native Americans and other groups from their homes. The rapid expansion of the United States intensified the issue of slavery as new states were added to the Union, leading to the outbreak of the Civil War. It also affected the US because the idea drove expansion, annexation and active movement towards the west. It also meant a constant struggle with Native Americans who inhabited the land.
Emotional I believe is the word you are going for
It is referred to as Bi-Laterael meaning two separate but equal parts
