Answer:
C) $4,000
Explanation:
To calculate economic profit we can use the following formula:
economic profit = total revenue - (accounting costs + implicit costs) = (total revenue - accounting cost) - implicit costs
where:
- accounting profit = total revenue - accounting cost = $50,000
- implicit costs: ($20,000 x 5%) + $45,000 = $1,000 + $45,000 = $46,000
economic profit = $50,000 - $46,000 = $4,000
Answer:
a. level 3
b.level 1
c. level 2
Explanation:
Vande Velde Company made three investments during 2017. Where will Vande Velde report these investments in the fair value hierarchy?1. It purchased 1,000 shares of Sastre Company, a start-up company. Vande Velde made the investment based on valuation estimates from an internally developed model.2. It purchased 2,000 shares of GE stock, which trades on the NYSE. 3. It invested $10,000 in local development authority bonds. Although these bonds do not trade on an active market, their value closely tracks movements in U.S. Treasury bond.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3) while Level 2 assets are financial assets and liabilities that are neither easy or overly complex to value.Going by the explanation the investment will be given hierarchy 3, 2,1
if Van verde purchased shares on the New York stock Exchange , then the percentage in price over time is more than the other two options . In stock purchase, investors can realised more profit on their stocks than bond which can give like 10-15% on the initial cash outlay. The only caveat is that Stocks is a little bit risky and could be volatile owing to price fluctuations ,and the forces of demand and supply.
Answer:
-$414,444.44
Explanation:
The computation of the net present value is shown below:
Net present value = Initial investment + net cash flows ÷ (required rate of return - projected growth rate)
= -$1,570,000 + $104,000 ÷ (12% - 3%)
= -$1,570,000 + $1,155,555.56
= -$414,444.44
Hence, the net present value is -$414,444.44
Since the net present value comes in negative so the project is rejected
Answer: $489,000
Explanation:
Amount of sales required = (Fixed cost + Desired operating income ) / Contribution margin ratio
Contribution margin ratio for Cover-to-Cover Company:
= Contribution margin / sales
= 77,800/ 389,000
= 20%
Desired operating income = Current income + income increase
= 58,350 + 20,000
= $78,350
Amount of sales required:
= (19,450 + 78,350) / 20%
= $489,000
Answer:
(b.) Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor
Explanation:
Under the Rules of the court Josh's action is referred to as Default of Appearance. Isabel is the Complainant while Josh is the Defendant.
It is the law that where a Defendant fails to appear before the court where there is a proof of service of the summons on him or her, Complainant may apply to the Judge for a judgement in respect of the claim on the summons to be entered in his or her favor against the Defendant.
Therefore, in the instance case at hand, Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor for failure of Josh to appear before the court.
Option (a) is not the answer because Isabel does not need to file an amended complaint because Isabel did not ask the court for any amendment of her complaint. Isabel can only file an amended complaint if she intends to change her complaint against Josh.
Option (c) is not also the answer because Josh chooses to ignore the summons served on him. If for instance Josh did not get the summons served on him or the judge is of the opinion that Josh was not properly served, then the court can order that Josh must be served with a second summons.
Option (d) is also not the answer because Josh cannot have a judgment entered in his favor because he is the person who defaulted appearance before the court. A party who is in default of appearance cannot have judgment entered in his favor.
