I would say 33.. But im not 100% sure
Answer:
Is irrelevant in decision making
Explanation:
Since the suck cost is the cost that no longer is recovered so it should not be a factor to consider when making a decision. For example, you have bought a cinema ticket for this evening, but it is heavily rainy so you may get sick if you go to the cinema. The fact that you have paid for this ticket should not consider whether to go or stay home since you can not get this amount of money no matter what happens.
<span>While
the new helmets
decrease the probability of a serious head injury resulting
from a bike accident, they also incentivize cyclists to ride less safely, which
could
increase the number of bike accidents and thus head injuries to cyclists
</span>
<span>Although the new helmets reduce the
probability of head injuries, such an outcome changes the incentives of
cyclists by making them less cautious</span>
Answer:
Negative, since to purchase more of one good means giving up some of the other good.
Explanation:
A budget line illustrates the number of goods, consumers are able to buy with lower income. Thus the price of goods and customers income to be spent on goods determine the budget line.
The slope of the budget line measures the opportunity cost of consuming Commodity A forgetting Commodity B. In order to get more of Commodity A, the consumer will have reduce the consumption of Commodity B Forefeiting the opportunity to consume Commodity B is the true opportunity cost of Commodity A and this measured by the slope of the budget line.
The slope of the budget line shows the amount of a commodityB the consumer must forfeit to purchase one more unit of a commodity A and the slope is usually Negative.
Hello!
The price rises when the quality rises, because the quality of the product depends on the quality of the feedstock.
Hugs!
