Answer:
1. Freedom from Unpayable Taxes. 2. Freedom from British Domination In their Land
Explanation:
In the early 1900s, Indians wanted Independence from the British because they craved for Freedom of Speech. Freedom from Unpayable Taxes. Freedom from British Domination In their Land.
Nationalism was intensified after 1918 for two main reasons:
1. There was a great degree of satisfaction with the reforms by the educated Indian nationals.
2. Many Brits were still dominant in India.
Woodrow Wilson had made Indians aware of his belief in national self-determination. He believed that Indians had a right to govern themselves and this undermined the basic idea of the colonialist Brits.
The answer is: cultural anthropologist.
Cultural anthropology is the branch of anthropology concerned with the study of human societies and cultures and their development.
Margaret Mead was an American cultural anthropologist who wrote about anthropology and its holistic approach to the human species. She wrote about how human development, also sexual, could be shaped by cultural demands and expectations. She compared gender roles in different societies, concentrating heavily on the regions of South Pacific and Southeast Asia.
She was a proponent of broadening sexual conventions and her thinking influenced the sexual revolution in the 1960's.
Because once an indentured servants time is up, you have to let them live their own life, but if you have a slave, you literally own them and keep them until they die if you choose to do so.
I don't know which specific context you refer to - the Han Chinese have conquered many people.
So I will provide one example - in Taiwan, the aboriginal people were required to have Chinese names in their passports until recently, which means that every person was forced to adopt a Chinese name, and often their original name was dropped, and (over generation) forgotten. This has changed how people self-identify: weakening their indigenous sense of identity.
Answer:
The southerners resisted the increased tariff in 1828 arguing it should be nullified because it benefited one section of the country at the expense of another
Explanation:
