1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blababa [14]
3 years ago
9

Why is pseudoscience bad?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Travka [436]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

because its just bad lol

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Jamie coaches a team of 10-year-old girls in softball. When they lost to their archrivals by a score of 7-2, the girls complaine
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

self-serving bias

Explanation:

The scenario being described is an example of a self-serving bias. This is mainly when someone blames other people or factors for the bad things that have happened to them. In this scenario, the girls are blaming the umpire as the reason that they lost the match, but in reality the girls most likely lost the match because they did not play as good as the oppossing team. For the team it is much easier to blame the umpire instead of accepting that the reason for losing was due to their own lack of practice.

7 0
3 years ago
Which two sentences use coordinate adjectives?
Gnom [1K]
A and C. Coordinate adjective are adjectives that can be switched up and it will still make sense.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
?a(n) _______________ family consists of at least three generations (e.g., parents, children, grandparents).
kondor19780726 [428]
The answer is extended family. The extended family is to live either with or set up of an individual from the close family. These families incorporate, in one family unit, close relatives notwithstanding a close family. A case would be an elderly parent who moves in with his or her youngsters because of seniority. In present-day Western societies ruled by close family builds, the term has come to be utilized blandly to allude to grandparents, uncles, aunties, and cousins, regardless of whether they live respectively inside a similar family or not.
8 0
3 years ago
According to the map, what was the great migration
belka [17]
——————-The answer is C.

6 0
3 years ago
What did Slave owning states believe about state's rights?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Rallying Cry of Secession

The appeal to state's rights is of the most potent symbols of the American Civil War, but confusion abounds as to the historical and present meaning of this federalist principle.

The concept of states' rights had been an old idea by 1860. The original thirteen colonies in America in the 1700s, separated from the mother country in Europe by a vast ocean, were use to making many of their own decisions and ignoring quite a few of the rules imposed on them from abroad. During the American Revolution, the founding fathers were forced to compromise with the states to ensure ratification of the Constitution and the establishment of a united country. In fact, the original Constitution banned slavery, but Virginia would not accept it; and Massachusetts would not ratify the document without a Bill of Rights.

Secession Speeches

South Carolinians crowd into the streets of Charleston in 1860 to hear speeches promoting secession.

The debate over which powers rightly belonged to the states and which to the Federal Government became heated again in the 1820s and 1830s fueled by the divisive issue of whether slavery would be allowed in the new territories forming as the nation expanded westward.

The Missouri Compromise in 1820 tried to solve the problem but succeeded only temporarily. (It established lands west of the Mississippi and below latitude 36º30' as slave and north of the line—except Missouri—as free.) Abolitionist groups sprang up in the North, making Southerners feel that their way of life was under attack. A violent slave revolt in 1831 in Virginia, Nat Turner’s Rebellion, forced the South to close ranks against criticism out of fear for their lives. They began to argue that slavery was not only necessary, but in fact, it was a positive good.

As the North and the South became more and more different, their goals and desires also separated. Arguments over national policy grew even fiercer. The North’s economic progress as the Southern economy began to stall fueled the fires of resentment. By the 1840s and 1850s, North and South had each evolved extreme positions that had as much to do with serving their own political interests as with the morality of slavery.

As long as there were an equal number of slave-holding states in the South as non-slave-holding states in the North, the two regions had even representation in the Senate and neither could dictate to the other. However, each new territory that applied for statehood threatened to upset this balance of power. Southerners consistently argued for states rights and a weak federal government but it was not until the 1850s that they raised the issue of secession. Southerners argued that, having ratified the Constitution and having agreed to join the new nation in the late 1780s, they retained the power to cancel the agreement and they threatened to do just that unless, as South Carolinian John C. Calhoun put it, the Senate passed a constitutional amendment to give back to the South “the power she possessed of protecting herself before the equilibrium of the two sections was destroyed.”

Controversial—but peaceful—attempts at a solution included legal compromises, arguments, and debates such as the Wilmot Proviso in 1846, Senator Lewis Cass’ idea of popular sovereignty in the late 1840s, the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, and the Lincoln-Douglas Debates in 1858. However well-meaning, Southerners felt that the laws favored the Northern economy and were designed to slowly stifle the South out of existence. The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 was one of the only pieces of legislation clearly in favor of the South. It meant that Northerners in free states were obligated, regardless of their feelings towards slavery, to turn escaped slaves who had made it North back over to their Southern masters. Northerners strongly resented the law and it was one of the inspirations for the publishing of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the approximate ratio of rural outlets to urban outlets?
    9·1 answer
  • Mark wrote his Gospel for ______, most likely, those living in _______.
    5·2 answers
  • You've just went "permanent change of station" from your initial training base to your first operational assignment at Seymour-J
    15·2 answers
  • What were the three social classes that divided the people in Sumer?
    13·1 answer
  • Is the earth overpopulated by humans
    13·2 answers
  • All of the following are roles of local committees EXCEPT
    7·2 answers
  • 2. Why is Finding Nemo compelling?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did we have segregated schools in the first place?
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the emergent-norm theory.
    12·2 answers
  • Which tactics were commonly used in the South to prevent African Americans from voting after Reconstruction?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!