I think Mr. Bradford paints a rather rosy picture that is perhaps only a bit true. I suspect life was hard and the new country life quite strange. It took a strong forbearance for the women especially to adapt to the varying climates, crude living quarters, and usually harder work than in England. The Indians reportedly did welcome the strangers at first but did in time become leery of these new people - some lied to the Indians and did not deserve their welcome, so there were clashes in time. I do not think the early colonies were very successful. Later colonists learned from the mistakes of the first.
Answer:
they tried first at roanoke island. this attempt was called the ralph lane colony. this failed though due to conflict with the native Americans that lived there. and lack of food and supplies. England tried one more time in 1587 but overall it amounted to nothing.
Explanation:
Hope this helps please give brainliest :)
I have encountered this question before. This was my answer.
The United States pursued gradual engagement to the Allied nations of Europe by passing the Lend-Lease Bill.
Under this bill, the United States will provide Great Britain the necessary supplies and armaments that it needs to fight against Germany. Knowing that Great Britain's liquidity is questionable, the United States will not demand immediate payment and when the time comes that payment is demanded,they will accept other modes of payment beside cash.
<span>In this scenario, the United States did not violate the Neutrality Act of 1939. They also ensured that the war fought in Europe will not reach their shores by ensuring that Great Britain has the capacity to fight and win the war against Germany. Thus, their assistance through lend-lease bill. </span>
Answer:
C. To get their candidates elected.
Explanation:
Political parties are compromised of people with the same ideology, same political positions, and are determined to get the official representative of their political party elected and thereby implement the party's agenda. The party leader is reposinble for the superintdending of it's relationship with it's supporters.