Actions that do not require criminal intent to be considered a criminal act are called "<span>Strict liability crimes".
In criminal law, Strict liability is liability for which mens rea which is Latin for "guilty mind", does not need to be demonstrated in connection to at least one components including the actus reus which is Latin for "guilty act", despite the fact that intent, carelessness or information might be required in connection to other components of the offense.
</span>
Imma say False, communists marching most likely would help the communist movement.
The examples in this questions describes what is known as the substantive representation.
The substantive representation can be explained to be the tendency of the elected members of the US representatives or legislators to advocate for certain groups of people in the society.
All of these people that were listed in this question are all running to be in the congress where they can act as representatives of the people.
Read more on brainly.com/question/9613317?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Conflict theory centers on the economical and social factors that can cause crime and the inequality that comes from it.
Explanation:
Conflict theorists suggest that these factors have a <em>correlation between race and wealth. </em>They center on the idea that those with power and money can <em>influence what affects them</em> and can even <em>influence the law to their favor. </em>
In this case, the difference in the sentence for possession of cocaine or crack cocaine is the example of an unequal system.
Since the users of cocaine are typically more affluent and white, they have their means and hold the power for bending the law in their favor and reducing the sentence for possession. Unlike them, crack cocaine users tend to have less means and are generally a minority so they cannot bend the law in their favor.