1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
finlep [7]
3 years ago
8

Why did both korea and japan’s attitudes toward contact with the outside world change

History
1 answer:
tia_tia [17]3 years ago
5 0

The isolationist postures of these countries changed since they were forced to, at least economically and in fear the western civilizations would invade them otherwise.

At the start of the Meiji Era, the newly appointed government of Japan decided to open trade to western civilizations, in hope that it would prevent a future dispute and improve the country technologically and economically - all of this under the impression of the "black ships'" appearance, on which the foreigners first arrived on.

Regarding Korea, the United States gained a lot of influence over the southern division of the country (Now South Korea) after the Korean War. This regime caused the country to shape and develop in the likes of the U.S. until the 1990's, efficiently ending the isolated government previosly imposed by the japanese. Today, the northern division of Korea (Now North Korea) continues to be isolated, following the communist ideologies of their former influencers and allies, the russian communists.

You might be interested in
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
4 years ago
At which convention was the constitution developed
7nadin3 [17]

The fifty-five delegates who met in Philadelphia between May 25 and September 17, 1787, would not only reject the Articles of Confederation altogether, but they would produce the first written constitution for any nation in the history of the world.

8 0
3 years ago
Need help asap!
Fynjy0 [20]

Explanation:

divide it this is the answer forty-five million

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did folk tales of Br’er Rabbit serve as covert resistance to enslavement?
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

B.

The tales showed a smaller trickster conquering more powerful figures, who represented enslavers

6 0
3 years ago
The means of production are controlled by individuals or private business in which economic system?
const2013 [10]

Answer: D. Capitalism

hope this helps

Explanation:

mark me brainleist pls

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Define commercial capitalism.
    7·1 answer
  • According to the map, which of the following are the most accurate coordinates for Washington, D.C.?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Reich citizenship law affect jews during the Holocaust?
    9·2 answers
  • Can someone help me please!!
    7·1 answer
  • During the middle ages all power came from which religious organization
    5·1 answer
  • How did captain John Smith help colonists in Jamestown
    13·1 answer
  • George Washington talked about foreign alliances in his farewell address. How did George Washington feel about foreign alliances
    12·1 answer
  • Super short paragraph and one question
    12·2 answers
  • SOMEONE PLZ HELP ME ASAP!!
    6·2 answers
  • Ok can someone tell me the answer to this. Is it ABC or D.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!