1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna11 [192]
3 years ago
8

Until modern times, most countries were ruled by

History
1 answer:
Bumek [7]3 years ago
5 0
Probably Some form of authoritarian government
You might be interested in
What do you think is one negative/bad thing about U.S. Imperialism in the 1900s?
UNO [17]

Answer:

Hello there, Here is the answer to your question UwU

Explanation:

Yet there are also setbacks that accompany U.S. imperialism. American colonization is destroying the culture of indigenous peoples who have forgotten their identity and tradition. In certain cases, indigenous residents grow up to discriminate against what is local and originally their own native community.

You're welcome in advance

6 0
3 years ago
In the 'action' column, describe the action taken by each group listed in the 'group' and 'situation' column.
frosja888 [35]
I know the parliament Boston tea party action was caused because people boycotted and beat the stamp  act. Their prices where raised so some people dressed like native Americans and dumped tea of the boat as a symbol.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ano ang kahulugan ng salitang Sikolohiya​
lakkis [162]

Answer:

???????????/

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Job responsibilities for Supreme Court
o-na [289]

Answer:

Responsibilities are being able to be not appealed and decisions on on cases dealing with the interpretation of the constitution i.e. it can overturn a law passed by Congress if it deems it unconstitutional

3 0
3 years ago
Summarize the US approach to advancing human rights and democracy since the Carter Administration
SVEN [57.7K]

In this human-rights-friendly environment, Jimmy Carter was elected president in 1976. Carter has justly received much attention for emphasizing human rights as part of his administration's diplomacy; he did not, however, invent the issue. Gaddis Smith has, along with other writers, shown that, in Smith's words, "Carter joined the crusade and made it his own." The principle impetus came from Congress, to the point that even such a strong supporter of human rights as Carter found himself arguing that Congress took human rights considerations too far. Still, Carter was more committed to promoting human rights than any other president into the early twenty-first century, in both words and action. As he wrote in his memoirs, "Our country has been strongest and most effective when morality and a commitment to freedom and democracy have been most clearly emphasized in our foreign policy."


8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did the Huns not invade?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the South fear admitting California as a free state
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the Roman Empire collapse
    14·1 answer
  • How might the cold war have progressed if the u-2 incident had never occurred?
    7·1 answer
  • Match the countries to the descriptions of events during and after World War I.
    11·2 answers
  • According to Thomas Paine, what are the three components of the British Constitution that needed to be examined and improved for
    14·1 answer
  • Which sentence about saying the Pledge of Allegiance in schools is an example of stereotyping?
    8·2 answers
  • What is the definition of generation
    11·2 answers
  • The largest source of revenue for the state of Texas is...
    11·2 answers
  • What is iconoclasm?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!