<h2>
Answer:</h2>
The reasoning used is <u>inductive reasoning</u>.
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
The type of reasoning where the examples are used to derive conclusion it is called as inductive reasoning. The end is the theory or plausible. This implies the end is the piece of thinking that inductive thinking is attempting to demonstrate. Inductive thinking is likewise alluded to as 'circumstances and logical results thinking' or 'base up thinking' since it looks to demonstrate an end first. This is normally gotten from explicit occasions to build up a general end.
As the given examples quotes many examples of desert and then derives conclusion out of it, this is considered as example of inductive reasoning.
It is between A and B.
But if the species is going to be extinct, that means that they are being threatened.
So the answer is B.
Answer:
silt 3
Explanation:
an aquaferis a rock layers that stores and allows the flow of groundwater
I am not sure but I think the answer is B the Andes glaciers will disappear
When a substance abuse treatment program is acquired by another program, the next course of action is that <u>if any patients refuse consent to transfer, those records maybe destroyed or retained in compliance with the statue of limitations</u>
Explanation:
The Substance Abuse Confidentiality Regulations devised by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration provides confidentiality to the patients undergoing a treatment program for substance abuse.
Under this regulation, section 2.19 details and sets forth rules to follow when a program is acquired by another program.
This states that the program must either purge the identifying details of the patient from its records or destroy it until or unless the patient consents for the transfer of details or information in the records.
This condition can be exceptional in compliance with the statute of limitations and the records can be retained, like in case of any legal requirements
.
