I have no answer I have never ever ever evr read that book srry about that just surch the web for a summery on those chapters then rephrase and you'll be good to goo
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Dramatic irony is irony that is in inherent in speeches or a situation of drama and is understood by the audience but not grasped by the caracters.
In this case, Gus in unaware that the badger will probably attack him. The badger has a know reputation of chewing through things and even snarled at Gus.
Answer:
Answer
Image result for education paragraph essay
Education is a process of learning through which we acquire knowledge. It enlightens, empowers, and creates a positive development. Education gives an individual the knowledge and skills to work with virtue. It aids the all-round mental, physical, and intellectual growth and development of an individual.
Explanation:
School
Answer:
The answer is most likely "a dynamic character".
Explanation:
Dynamic simply means that the character changed, or, in this case, experienced growth. Contrast this with a "static" character, whose character doesn't change much or at all throughout a story.
It has been frequently and rightly remarked that the Crito is unique among
Plato’s dialogues insofar as its primary concern is what Socrates ought to do.
2
Most interpreters assume that Socrates ought to do what seems best to his reason (Cr 46b3-6); thus, most interpretations defend the rationality of obedience
or disobedience. On my account, it is not at all obvious that Socrates ought to
do what seems best to his reason. On my account, Socrates does not do what
seems best to his reason because he does not reason about whether he should
obey the laws; he simply obeys the laws. Doubtless, this claim seems counterintuitive to many; after all, does not Socrates articulate and defend his reasons
for remaining in prison from 49c to 54c? Is it not the cogency of Socrates’ reasons
for remaining in prison that have been so thoroughly debated in the scholarship summarized below? My answer to both of these questions is ‘no.’ Perhaps
counter-intuitively I claim that the reasons for remaining in prison, from Crito
49c to54c, are not Socrates’ reasons; they are the arguments of the speaking laws
of Athens
